bad were the concerns that have been the occasion of the wasps coalition in terms of social degradation and nuclear contamination of the Republic expressed. But probably even the biggest pessimists were still surprised by the raging amateurism, the new government was the fact in the coalition negotiations. Since when should
unloved Health Fund " get the bureaucratic shell remain and only the content objects are removed, and how absurd the idea sounded, some loads from the budget to outsource and rebook the flight issue to be considered as income? Of "slush funds" for the government because they spoke in a newspaper, I heard elsewhere, the concept of "bad banks" should be stored in the burden of the crisis.
Well, now is off the table. And that this kind incapacity is punished in four years, it may be hoped not, the experience shows that political parties perform any real satire and the citizens to his heart's desire to draw on the table - at the next Election will be elected but the same as always, or sometimes the one who makes the most attractive promises.
What actually shows that the extension of the "bad bank" principle is perhaps not such a bad idea and was placed too early in the files. A Bad Bank for bad government spending, even thought it was just too small: What does this republic would be a bad bank for all - a bad bank for the citizens.
How about if we cut off in the future an entire part of the country would be subcontracted and all the voters there, in the past by notorious obstinacy, good faith or political indifference noticed? This would allow the government politically mature citizens will look sharp on the fingers, unencumbered by rotten core voters. They could handle their own area then yes, without preventing the rest of the country's healthy development.
impossible to realize, maybe. But who is convinced of the principle of "bad banks", should actually also the "Bad Republic are" attractive - at least as long as its own assets are not found in the unhealthy part of the portfolio ;-)
