How do you feel you, how are you - at the intersection between yesterday and tomorrow, between the passing and the coming year?
Friday, December 31, 2010
Weed And Melesenteric Adinitus
Christmas Christmas Christmas
How do you feel you, how are you - at the intersection between yesterday and tomorrow, between the passing and the coming year?
How do you feel you, how are you - at the intersection between yesterday and tomorrow, between the passing and the coming year?
Thursday, December 30, 2010
How Much Is The Movie Unleashed Worth
VIII question question question VI VII
office What you before you, when you think of the future - the current time is before you - that idea - or even intentions - do you have? 
office What you before you, when you think of the future - the current time is before you - that idea - or even intentions - do you have?
Buy Giro Bad Lieutenant Helmet
With the Psi-force wake
end of the year is it's still scary times! For DJ Bem, a psychologist at Cornell University, a preliminary version has provided a professional article, in which it is about nothing less than the experimental detection of Psi-powers! The promising title: "Feeling the Future: Experimental evidence of abnormal retroactive effects on cognition and affect" ( Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anormalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect ). And in this article nine psychological experiments and their results are presented, which have in fact in itself! For it is claimed on the evidence, not the future events, the occurrence is determined, can influence the thinking and acting. So it should be possible for human beings, the place of emergence of pornographic images ( or representations of "couples who are involved in non-violent and consensual, but explicit sexual conduct" as the scientist formulates ) on the computer screen to know before has set a random this place. Or one should better remember words you will learn in the future, even if you do not even know that they will learn it and has not yet determined a random word to be learned. The research results are of course spectacular, so I want to forget sometimes that I am neither a psychologist nor a statistician, but at times to take a closer look at the article!
end of the year is it's still scary times! For DJ Bem, a psychologist at Cornell University, a preliminary version has provided a professional article, in which it is about nothing less than the experimental detection of Psi-powers! The promising title: "Feeling the Future: Experimental evidence of abnormal retroactive effects on cognition and affect" ( Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anormalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect ). And in this article nine psychological experiments and their results are presented, which have in fact in itself! For it is claimed on the evidence, not the future events, the occurrence is determined, can influence the thinking and acting. So it should be possible for human beings, the place of emergence of pornographic images ( or representations of "couples who are involved in non-violent and consensual, but explicit sexual conduct" as the scientist formulates ) on the computer screen to know before has set a random this place. Or one should better remember words you will learn in the future, even if you do not even know that they will learn it and has not yet determined a random word to be learned. The research results are of course spectacular, so I want to forget sometimes that I am neither a psychologist nor a statistician, but at times to take a closer look at the article!
Of course, the abnormal effects of current decisions on future very small. If they were not, they'd notice in everyday life. The low strength of these effects, however, will force to perform statistical calculations to determine whether the observed effect is a mere accident, or genuine "psi powers" are at work. The easiest way to show it on the first experiment of the article. There are subjects to predict which appear in two fields on the screen an image. After the election of the subject chooses a random field from, on which the image is then displayed. If only chance is at work, one should expect on average 50% correct predictions. But when it comes to porn images, the hit rate was 53.1%, slightly above the expected hit rate by chance. Is this evidence of a mysterious prediction of the future? To decide this you need at the statistics. For if one performs only a few attempts, it will not be likely to deviate from the theoretical mean, even if only pure chance in the game. If you only as a coin twenty times throws, it will not appear particularly suspicious if you have 12 times the "head" and only 8 times tails thrown. If one but two million times the coin throws, and it has 1.2 million times, "head" 000 times and 800 "number" to get, then maybe it would pay the Verdaches that the coin was easily manipulated. And we must also decide in the article, what is more normal accident, and what is a real effect. And to the author of the article, a whole series of statistical tests are used, the results are almost universally that the chances for a purely random occurrence of the test results are so at around the 1% for individual experiments. For an experiment that may not be as impressive, but in nine experiments? That is quite remarkable, and you want the results like to take a closer look! But since then the problems begin.
For the article presented the actual test results almost absent, and it is hardly possible to recalculate the probability values given for the random occurrence of the results. The only thing that is possible for some trials, the review of " binomial test," carried out by the author. And since meeting a little strange ...
Let's start with Experiment 1, in which the pornographic images. In the description of the experiment is that only 40 subjects twelve guesses with porn images 're running as a perceived negative pictures and neutral-looking images. Another 60 subjects have completed each of 18 experiments with porn images not erotic, but positive images occupied. So overall, should times 18, ie, 1560 experiments have been carried out with erotic pictures 40 times 12 plus 60th Of all the experiments with erotic pictures to have been made in 53.1% correct predictions. That would be 828 or 829 hits, just the can not tell when rounding to one decimal. This result has tested the author to a binomial test against the hypothesis that the test result is only a coincidence. He is a z-value of 2.30 and a probability p for that one has 828 (or 829?) hits or more at 1560 rate experiments at 1.1%.
we Convert to. The z-value is obtained by dividing the measured value: converts (here 828 or 829) to a normal distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. The conversion should be very simple in this case, because the measurements should, if only by chance in the game is to follow a binomial distribution with p = 0.5 . In n trials (n = 1560 here is ) is the expected value then n / p and the variance is the square root of np (1-p) . To get to the z-value must be deducted from the value of Erwarungswert be, and are divided by the variance. With the given numbers (p = 0.5 , n = 1560 ) to get it to a z-value of 2.43 (for 828 hits) or 2.48 (for 829 goals), but not to 2 , 30, as mentioned in the article. No idea what is wrong here.
The probability p can be determined directly from the cumulative binomial distribution. Results for 828 would be the 0.81% for 0.70%, but not 1.1% as in the article. However, we obtain the stated 1.1% if you take the z-value of 2.30, and assuming a normal distribution. Obviously, all the chances in the article are not from the binomial distribution directly but calculated using the z-value from a normal distribution was. This is maybe not very elegant, but caused only a minor error.
Whence come the differences between the above and recalculating the article, I do not (comments welcome!). But there are still a few more cases in the article, where you can verify the binomial test. And since the observed deviations are very small, but all the more remarkable.
Take the first times in Table 2 In the second column as the results for Experiment 2 are given. In total of 5400 tests were 2790 hits, ie the hit rate was 51.7% (correct). The z value of this is given as 2.44. If you add yourself to, we find 2.45. That's not very dramatic, and the value for p result of 0.7% from the normal distribution for both 2.44 and for 2.45. Perhaps only a small rounding error.
we go to Table 3 Here are 963 results for 1800 trials, ie a rate of 53.5% (right). The specified z-value is 2.95. If you the math, but we find 2.97. That's strange. The value of p of 0.2% must then also have been calculated z = 2.95 , because with z = 2.97 would be a value of p received = 0.1%.
is still more remarkable is when we go to Table 6 of the article and then recalculate the figures for the binomial test. Here there are a total of 2304 tests results in 1105, ie a rate of 48.0% and not 47.9% as in the article. As z-value is -1.94, and p with this z-value was calculated. If one is found, however the math a z of -1.96.
Conclusion:
The probabilities p have not been calculated directly from the test results, but from the z-values. The z-values do not match the given test results. The differences are very small, in the final digit shown, but not one, but two digits next to it, which argues against a simple rounding error.
Where do these deviations, I do not, of course. But we can make a little mental game. Suppose I n have conducted trials. Suppose, further, I'm not myself so much for the actual number of hits, which was achieved, but I would rather have a specific z-value that an attempt is unlikely to result by pure chance. Then I choose a z-value that I would have liked. By then I calculate the probability p . Only I have now the right number of hits Found that I would have determined experimentally. So I count back with n and the z-value of the number of hits. Only the number of results must of course be an integer, so round Would I return my result by calculation to the nearest whole number, I do that, I came with my Table 6 for z from -1.94 to 1105.44 hit, so 1105, as indicated. For Table 3 gives the fixed z = 2.95 then 962.58, then 963 hits, as indicated. And Table 2, with z = 2.44 , I get hit 2789.65, rounded to 2790, as indicated. So I would have exactly the number of hits, z-values and probabilities p that are specified in the tables work.
The tiny differences between the recalculated z-values and z values stated in the article can be understood so easily if we assume that the conclusions of the work were not determined from the experimental results, but the test results from the conclusions.
And once again I am happy to run my anonymous blog ... ;-) But maybe I am doing a mistake. In any case, I do not trust the spectacular proof of psi powers only once no tiny little bit! And whether this will change in the future, this knowledge must probably still be hiding in my subconscious.
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Comebacks For Being Called Four Eyes
What puzzles employ up between heaven and earth, who or what you want to pursue?
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
How To Make The Coolest Tin Foil Boat
Christmas Christmas Christmas Question IV Question V
What do you regret what you've forgotten what you want to do differently? 
What do you regret what you've forgotten what you want to do differently?
Monday, December 27, 2010
Find Pokemon Sources For Cydia
What you Christmas - the sacred time - which you are connecting with it and what you ache for it?
Best Cruise For 40 Year Old Couple
Hegel Prize for contempt of logic 2010
Candidate A: Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, Vienna, Berufsgläubischer
The first nomination goes to a specialist for children vedient fuck out of the Catholic clergy. On kat.net of 5 March 2010, the cardinal was quoted:
"If celibacy would blame [of sexual abuse], then there should be no abuse in the family."
Exactly. Presumably, one must first overcome years of theological studies in order to find this inference plausible. If one has the Reasoning but once internalized, will light a lot further: If alcohol consumption would have to blame for traffic accidents, remaining sober people do not have accidents. Too bad that it just had to be the Protestant Käßmann that drove this reasoning to its ultimate conclusion!
Candidate B: Anton Stucki, Treuenbrietzen, Klärwerksbereiber
Mr. Stucki sonicated in its wastewater treatment plant bacteria, with music by Mozart, to encourage them to better water treatment. In an interview with the Süddeutsche Zeitung of 2 June 2010 he explains the logic behind this original action with the words:
"His [ie, Mozart's] music affects people of all ages and cultural backgrounds. So why not on microbes? Microbes but being as we are."
Exactly. At least as most of us. And people of all ages and cultural backgrounds clarifiers are disgusting. The question of why microbes still feel it probably is waiting, as the "Stucki paradox" on their answer by a competent treatment plant operator!
profound Not yet beautiful and so well deserved nomination.
Candidate C: Dirk Niebel, Berlin, Development Aid Minister
2010 was indeed a year of football, so there must also comment on the Soccer ago. And the Lord has provided Niebel, even though I'm not sure how serious it was meant. Although the FDP is indeed the fun party expert (tax cuts for hotel accommodation, Late Roman Dekandenz the Hartz IV ,...), but with politicians you never know ... In an interview from
And finally:
candidate D: Roland Duerden, Vienna, comedian
equal even a nomination goes to Austria! The question "Is there for you God?" he answered in courier of 21 October finished with. "Yes, of course, in the sense that one crosses out the word of God and for writing down the word of life: I really can not explain it, what is the life This is the big one. Mystery is why the scientists in Switzerland send particles in a circle. Here, the Indians have always been known everything "except times like this that the white coat to answer the question, what is life, instead of particles to send in a circle, simply should even ask for Winnetou -. I myself am also convinced that it God gives, if one "God" with "Wackeldackel replaced! And spinach tastes much better when he was replaced before serving with a steak! much plausible argument has to be rewarded with a nomination!
A year is coming to an end, and once again all the inevitable retrospectives and tributes to a patter down. And the Ig Nobel Prizes and Nobel Prizes are awarded , winner of the Word and the word of the year, but a critical assessment of much missed: the award for most outstanding disregard the logic of the year. And this gap will close this blog now and the first awards of the Hegel Prize for the disregard of logic ! to draw conclusions from senseless stupid premise is so commonplace that one no longer remember. Yes, entire professions, good living from it. All the more reason to appreciate the few bright spirits who shave not only long for the popular rules of logical inference, to differences between correlation and causality, or simply the meaning of terms, but proceed immediately creative and uninhibited to approve new insights . Not quite clear what is meant? Then end with the theory, we proceed immediately proceeds to the nominations for 2010, it becomes clear what is at stake!
And here they are! A panel of selected authors of this blog has unanimously appointed the following persons of outstanding nominations ausgewäht. Subsequent nomination are formless, justified request possible. The candidates, in chronological order:
The first nomination goes to a specialist for children vedient fuck out of the Catholic clergy. On kat.net of 5 March 2010, the cardinal was quoted:
"If celibacy would blame [of sexual abuse], then there should be no abuse in the family."
Exactly. Presumably, one must first overcome years of theological studies in order to find this inference plausible. If one has the Reasoning but once internalized, will light a lot further: If alcohol consumption would have to blame for traffic accidents, remaining sober people do not have accidents. Too bad that it just had to be the Protestant Käßmann that drove this reasoning to its ultimate conclusion!
Candidate B: Anton Stucki, Treuenbrietzen, Klärwerksbereiber
Mr. Stucki sonicated in its wastewater treatment plant bacteria, with music by Mozart, to encourage them to better water treatment. In an interview with the Süddeutsche Zeitung of 2 June 2010 he explains the logic behind this original action with the words:
"His [ie, Mozart's] music affects people of all ages and cultural backgrounds. So why not on microbes? Microbes but being as we are."
Exactly. At least as most of us. And people of all ages and cultural backgrounds clarifiers are disgusting. The question of why microbes still feel it probably is waiting, as the "Stucki paradox" on their answer by a competent treatment plant operator!
profound Not yet beautiful and so well deserved nomination.
Candidate C: Dirk Niebel, Berlin, Development Aid Minister
2010 was indeed a year of football, so there must also comment on the Soccer ago. And the Lord has provided Niebel, even though I'm not sure how serious it was meant. Although the FDP is indeed the fun party expert (tax cuts for hotel accommodation, Late Roman Dekandenz the Hartz IV ,...), but with politicians you never know ... In an interview from
with Leipziger Volkszeitung 16th June , after only one game of the German team at the World Cup, he founded the world title for Germany wiefolgt ". Germany will therefore champion, because Germany has only ever won the world championship if the FDP has been in a federal government"
with inductive logic in the colorful world of causality! The Fact that I had only ever have sex when the CDU or SPD presented the Chancellor, I should finally be included in my choices! Thank you, FDP! But there's a nomination on the launch pad C.
with inductive logic in the colorful world of causality! The Fact that I had only ever have sex when the CDU or SPD presented the Chancellor, I should finally be included in my choices! Thank you, FDP! But there's a nomination on the launch pad C.
And finally:
candidate D: Roland Duerden, Vienna, comedian
equal even a nomination goes to Austria! The question "Is there for you God?" he answered in courier of 21 October finished with. "Yes, of course, in the sense that one crosses out the word of God and for writing down the word of life: I really can not explain it, what is the life This is the big one. Mystery is why the scientists in Switzerland send particles in a circle. Here, the Indians have always been known everything "except times like this that the white coat to answer the question, what is life, instead of particles to send in a circle, simply should even ask for Winnetou -. I myself am also convinced that it God gives, if one "God" with "Wackeldackel replaced! And spinach tastes much better when he was replaced before serving with a steak! much plausible argument has to be rewarded with a nomination!
And now the reader asked, because this is quite a democratic basis to vote! Just in the header of the blog, who to be the first recipient of the Hegel Prize for the disregard of logic!
On 1 February will be declared the winner and in a ceremony on this blog is not informed of his success!
Happy!
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Big Woman Wearing A Girdle
Christmas Question III
What are you waiting for - if you look at the world from you, and from the world look at you - and what do you hope from your expectation? 
What are you waiting for - if you look at the world from you, and from the world look at you - and what do you hope from your expectation?
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Wifi On 20gb Ps3 2010
Christmas Christmas Question I Question II
What pictures arise in you when you look back, when you think of Christmases of your childhood? 
What pictures arise in you when you look back, when you think of Christmases of your childhood?
Friday, December 24, 2010
Spanish Examples Of Wedding Invitation Wording
What do you wish you, who or what you want to help a birth?
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Zoophilia Videa Zdarma
plays another round
The claim that atheism is also a form of faith (or at least what passes for this) so would not get better by repetition. So one can at least read it or hear. But I'm that do not learn, and I dedicate myself yet once again the subject, again from another side. For hardly a rejection that is not held against how it would be better. And in the case of faith which is typically the science, at least in the empirical sciences, or further restricts the natural sciences. So let's go to the question of what makes an empirical science into one. Laaaangweilig! Because of course there is wonderful harmony in the fact that it is the testability of a theory of experience, and in particular its refutability by experience that makes a theory of an empirical science. Here we go but still a bit further into detail.
The claim that atheism is also a form of faith (or at least what passes for this) so would not get better by repetition. So one can at least read it or hear. But I'm that do not learn, and I dedicate myself yet once again the subject, again from another side. For hardly a rejection that is not held against how it would be better. And in the case of faith which is typically the science, at least in the empirical sciences, or further restricts the natural sciences. So let's go to the question of what makes an empirical science into one. Laaaangweilig! Because of course there is wonderful harmony in the fact that it is the testability of a theory of experience, and in particular its refutability by experience that makes a theory of an empirical science. Here we go but still a bit further into detail.
The demand to rebuttal, that is, falsifiability, just consider two demands on a statement. Once a statement has to have a logical form that allowed a rebuttal. The beautiful example statement All bachelors are unmarried is not refutable, and the logical basis of their form. Their accuracy is ensured by the meaning of their components, and one may call such a statement analytically. (This, this point brings so his difficulties today was ignored again.) allowed if the logical form of a statement is a refutation, but that does not mean that they also experience, ie observation of the world, can be refuted. The statement God will that anyone who has sex with a menstruating, is killed (Lev 20, 18), although it allows logical refutation, but not a refutation by observation of the world. Therefore, the aggravation, to demand the next logical refutability empirically refutable.
So you now have a beautifully ordered world. Once added to the analytical statements that you can keep boring at best. Then there is the logical, but not empirically refutable statements that are bad. And then you have the empirically refutable statements, which are good and scientifically. But we can go to the empirically refutable statements a bit further into detail.
When is a statement empirically refutable? The answer is not so easy when it is time precise. It is raining outside can you check yes or empirically obvious. And how is it with Tomorrow will be here rain ? Until tomorrow, you can still wait, and then check. And what about In exactly 100 years it will regenen here? Or In just 2 million years it will rain here ? Considering all these sentences to the same extent as refutable? Probably not, but where you put the line?
But we are more fundamental. The question of when one accepts a statement as empirically refutable out, apparently the question of what methods you allow to verify a statement. And wait for 2 million years or entrails will not allow it, but only methods that are "scientific". This is the question of what is an (empirical) science, simply the question of the methods that are allowed. And that can change dramatically.
first time they may change within a scientific discipline with time. A prime example is the introduction of the telescope in astronomy. A good part of the resistance to feel the Galileo was touched, so that his contemporaries as a telescope would allow an instrument of knowledge discovery across the sky. This rejection had metaphysical reasons. The spheres of heaven were fundamentally different nature than the earth, and just because a good telescope in observing earthly objects works, that does not mean that it is also useful for observing celestial objects. And today this attitude has completely reversed. Today, it is assumed that the same natural laws that exist on earth, unchanged into the distant region of the universe are applicable. Again, this is ultimately a metaphysical assumption. Although it is logically falsifiable, but not empirically, and thus not itself (natural) science.
And also Subject to subject, the methods vary. Again you can use a recent example from astronomy. You look around for objects in the outer solar system by searching for occultations of stars by such objects. Such a measurement would then theoretically unique and unrepeatable. Certainly would gain knowledge through unique, non-repeatable and verifiable by other measurements for the physics of a nightmare. Astronomers seem to be as flexible in their time of need. Another fine example is the theory of evolution, when compared to significantly scale down the requirements for the physics is ready (survive the most adapted to living beings. And best suited the creatures that have survived. Such structures can be the theory of evolution as a physicist - go through - and rightly so. For the psychoanalytically inclined physicists probably do, methodically being picky. )
So back to the real question, what (different empirical) science than other schools of thought. Ultimately, this then, are the accepted methods. And that differ from discipline to discipline and are subject to change over time. In addition, the approval of methods metaphysical ideas flow with a significantly (which here is not empirically refutable considerations to be understood).
And the claim that scientific findings are, by their very nature, others, particularly religious, consider interpretations of the world is reduced, thus ultimately on the allegation that certain empirically refutable his other assumptions not empirically refutable assumptions preferable. And that may well be so. Just - a fundamental difference I can not see, unfortunately.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Best Exercises For A Torn Rotator Cuff
Between the Times: Questions for the holy nights 2010/11
Dear readers, questions move. They shed light, lead, and guide us - if we want to. Let us understand the past, help to live the present and shape the future. Ask open interior, and sometimes outer space, questions lead into the depths, into the air and into the distance.
I have prepared for the Christmas season, the holy nights, questions. And I will, starting with 24.12. To place each afternoon on my blog page. My wish and my idea is that the night these questions inner space is available, in which they can move. I hereby would like to invite you all warm and participate, to read these questions, they take with them nachzulauschen and watch what is produced.
questions can be born from within ourselves or coming from the outside on us. You can surround us and show new ways. There are issues relating to the intellectual level, as well as on the emotional or volitional level. Questions may seem like inner engine, put the whole mountain.
We live in fast time structures, in an apparent response culture. Everywhere there are professionals who are an attempt to answer our questions quickly everyday to overcome difficulties and uncertainties to mitigate. Most of the money is playing a role. But that's not all, because there are Questions can be answered easily, or not organize. Questions that ask for an open space, the search for the Personal, Unusual, Unsuspecting, dreamy or incomplete. Questions which need to be worn.
The holiday season is a special time for it, as the world pauses for a moment. This time can create a stillness, open our hearts and allow inner rooms. No matter where we are, no matter what we do. It means that we can have in the holy nights an unconscious encounter with our higher self. It is a time when heaven and earth are close. A time of retrospection and of foresight, a time of between, a space. But also a time when the moment, the presence of particular importance. There are days between yesterday and tomorrow, and so the day of presence - past and future merge in the now.
offers I would have any kind of responses to the questions I ask. This can be anonymous or by name - like, of course, as a public comment so that all can share in it, who want it. It can provide answers, links, stories, dreams, pictures, poems, quotes, thoughts, feelings, impulses of will, further questions, or anything else ... all this must not "understand" are not explained or be justified. It just goes to that cause what the questions where they direct you what they do to you.
My Christmas Questions for the holy "mean" come from three areas: in the field of desire / longing, the field of vision / intent and in the field of decision / resolution. These are the questions that create a connection between the individual and the world in which the world is expressed in the individual and vice versa. And they are questions that make the time current experience, guided by the past through the present into the future. (Who knows the human science of Rudolf Steiner, is an idea of why I chose these areas.)
all readers I wish a happy Christmas, with lots of imagination, inspiration and intuition and a good new year full of questions and answers! Welcome, Sophie Pannitschka 
Dear readers, questions move. They shed light, lead, and guide us - if we want to. Let us understand the past, help to live the present and shape the future. Ask open interior, and sometimes outer space, questions lead into the depths, into the air and into the distance.
I have prepared for the Christmas season, the holy nights, questions. And I will, starting with 24.12. To place each afternoon on my blog page. My wish and my idea is that the night these questions inner space is available, in which they can move. I hereby would like to invite you all warm and participate, to read these questions, they take with them nachzulauschen and watch what is produced.
questions can be born from within ourselves or coming from the outside on us. You can surround us and show new ways. There are issues relating to the intellectual level, as well as on the emotional or volitional level. Questions may seem like inner engine, put the whole mountain.
We live in fast time structures, in an apparent response culture. Everywhere there are professionals who are an attempt to answer our questions quickly everyday to overcome difficulties and uncertainties to mitigate. Most of the money is playing a role. But that's not all, because there are Questions can be answered easily, or not organize. Questions that ask for an open space, the search for the Personal, Unusual, Unsuspecting, dreamy or incomplete. Questions which need to be worn.
The holiday season is a special time for it, as the world pauses for a moment. This time can create a stillness, open our hearts and allow inner rooms. No matter where we are, no matter what we do. It means that we can have in the holy nights an unconscious encounter with our higher self. It is a time when heaven and earth are close. A time of retrospection and of foresight, a time of between, a space. But also a time when the moment, the presence of particular importance. There are days between yesterday and tomorrow, and so the day of presence - past and future merge in the now.
offers I would have any kind of responses to the questions I ask. This can be anonymous or by name - like, of course, as a public comment so that all can share in it, who want it. It can provide answers, links, stories, dreams, pictures, poems, quotes, thoughts, feelings, impulses of will, further questions, or anything else ... all this must not "understand" are not explained or be justified. It just goes to that cause what the questions where they direct you what they do to you.
My Christmas Questions for the holy "mean" come from three areas: in the field of desire / longing, the field of vision / intent and in the field of decision / resolution. These are the questions that create a connection between the individual and the world in which the world is expressed in the individual and vice versa. And they are questions that make the time current experience, guided by the past through the present into the future. (Who knows the human science of Rudolf Steiner, is an idea of why I chose these areas.)
all readers I wish a happy Christmas, with lots of imagination, inspiration and intuition and a good new year full of questions and answers! Welcome, Sophie Pannitschka
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Is The Rawlings Primo Worth Buying
addition.
The time before Christmas, not of peace is still very much dominated by reflection. Anna tries to stay still in their midst, but she feels that it varies, sometimes they lose track. The Rock of Gibraltar has become a tottering pillar in the wind. If she closes her eyes, she felt her fatigue, her sadness, her despair - between all the things to do. It usually falls
into a deep sleep at night and wakes up only by a shrill alarm clock in the dark. But this time she wakes up suddenly in the middle of the night - on its own - and it's very dark around her. But internally, they immediately sensed the light, the little that shines there. She feels the warmth of her body belongs to knock her heart, feels light and free. Just before she starts to turn again to weiterzuschlafen, she decides to stay awake.
against the admonishing words of her head, which will turn on and produces rational warnings: should you sleep, relax for the day, generate forces, just SLEEP. But Anna is alive. And it assumes that. It is very still and feel how open her heart. She listens to the tunes of the night. Fine words. gives
The night her words, a free period, she gets holiday - from her night sleep - and takes the hesitation. They lived through the open space that is given her, and enters into it. She stands and turns to the window. It is winter. Cold. And the star-lit abundance hot and cold in the night sky. Light and darkness - so close together. Just like the emptiness and fullness that she feels the same in itself. The tranquility and ascended, the movement and pause.
difficult it is, whenever the opposition struggle with each other when they feel attacked by their opponent. To fight their place, their sovereignty. If the mutual recognition fails. Without light, no shadows, no shadows no light. That can be imagined. What feelings arise, however, if this wisdom does not think, but is experienced?
Anna feels like it will internally continue to expand. It is still at the window, very quiet. And she takes part in the past and a glimpse of the future, she feels the current time. And suddenly feels that she is a little star. That hooks. With this one. Still her tears down her cheeks, small stars on the earth.
people appear at its heart inside. And they feel, how their fate into their network begins to rain - even though people are all asleep in any place to dream ... probably. Or is there someone who is awake now? The stars considered? Just as they - can conquer and from his own heart?
How shooting stars are the words. Submit. And, they add. Just as it knows Anna from a poem by Erich Fried. And she thanks, yes, to whom, perhaps himself - for this night hours, alone at the window with the cold, wintry sky, they back together again.
additions
It is a poet
is a
the words
assembles
That's not true
A poet
is a
the words
still halfway
together
if lucky
When misfortune has
tear the words
him apart
Erich Fried 
The time before Christmas, not of peace is still very much dominated by reflection. Anna tries to stay still in their midst, but she feels that it varies, sometimes they lose track. The Rock of Gibraltar has become a tottering pillar in the wind. If she closes her eyes, she felt her fatigue, her sadness, her despair - between all the things to do. It usually falls
into a deep sleep at night and wakes up only by a shrill alarm clock in the dark. But this time she wakes up suddenly in the middle of the night - on its own - and it's very dark around her. But internally, they immediately sensed the light, the little that shines there. She feels the warmth of her body belongs to knock her heart, feels light and free. Just before she starts to turn again to weiterzuschlafen, she decides to stay awake.
against the admonishing words of her head, which will turn on and produces rational warnings: should you sleep, relax for the day, generate forces, just SLEEP. But Anna is alive. And it assumes that. It is very still and feel how open her heart. She listens to the tunes of the night. Fine words. gives
The night her words, a free period, she gets holiday - from her night sleep - and takes the hesitation. They lived through the open space that is given her, and enters into it. She stands and turns to the window. It is winter. Cold. And the star-lit abundance hot and cold in the night sky. Light and darkness - so close together. Just like the emptiness and fullness that she feels the same in itself. The tranquility and ascended, the movement and pause.
difficult it is, whenever the opposition struggle with each other when they feel attacked by their opponent. To fight their place, their sovereignty. If the mutual recognition fails. Without light, no shadows, no shadows no light. That can be imagined. What feelings arise, however, if this wisdom does not think, but is experienced?
Anna feels like it will internally continue to expand. It is still at the window, very quiet. And she takes part in the past and a glimpse of the future, she feels the current time. And suddenly feels that she is a little star. That hooks. With this one. Still her tears down her cheeks, small stars on the earth.
people appear at its heart inside. And they feel, how their fate into their network begins to rain - even though people are all asleep in any place to dream ... probably. Or is there someone who is awake now? The stars considered? Just as they - can conquer and from his own heart?
How shooting stars are the words. Submit. And, they add. Just as it knows Anna from a poem by Erich Fried. And she thanks, yes, to whom, perhaps himself - for this night hours, alone at the window with the cold, wintry sky, they back together again.
additions
It is a poet
is a
the words
assembles
That's not true
A poet
is a
the words
still halfway
together
if lucky
When misfortune has
tear the words
him apart
Erich Fried
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Career Training Loans Tax Deductible
believe Dear Andreas Müller!
is actually meant for something even commenting on the blog, but now I just have to respond through a blog post on your text Boring . I will continue to do so thoroughly and objectively, and maybe you can, too, at least once and give short, the usual shouting and tapering? An attempt ...
is actually meant for something even commenting on the blog, but now I just have to respond through a blog post on your text Boring . I will continue to do so thoroughly and objectively, and maybe you can, too, at least once and give short, the usual shouting and tapering? An attempt ...
we going thing at a time. First, to me and my blog. Actually rather trivial, but I'm still a need:
They accuse this blog that it was "somewhat confused". In fact, I am well aware that his thematic diversity makes it difficult to read. However, I've consciously decided all issues on which I wish to speak to summarize in a blog. For most, more or less mono-thematic blogs I have the impression that it only by a group of like-minded and its bitter opponents of read, and contact with other perspectives and issues hardly takes place. On such a "closed society" I want to do without, if possible, even if should suffer the readability and access rates. And someone should partout only one subject is interested, there are still sorting by columns.
The second charge, I refuse to take a stand, I think was very inappropriate, because I get the strong impression that you have not taken the trouble to some of my rather dry text under "atheism" or "religion" to read. However, I must admit that I am afraid a "tag" to my sticking opinion. I myself am an atheist, that word seems to fit me best, but with the atheists among widespread belief in science and in my view, excessive philosophical self-confidence very dissatisfied. In addition, I am very outspoken "relativist". However, this does not mean that I am basically shy to speak sentences. However, I am aware that there were none for my own personal judgments, there are ethical, political or even scientific, and secure a final notice. The responsibility to do or not do, will remain with me alone. In this respect I myself am also a "fundamentalist", but that my Actions of my personal beliefs arise, but again not a fundamentalist, because I feel my beliefs not as privileged in any way.
Now to the actual topic. From their position on ethics, I'm not really smart. On the one hand, you seem a "eliminationist physicalism" are too close? On the other hand, you want to ethics objectively with scientific methods?
The problem is, in my opinion, is that ethical sentences, including sentences of the form I want to "One should ..." or "You should not ..." Understanding can not be concluded from scientific principles. This prevents even the logical form of sentences (a science kit can, for example, expressed in predicate logic form, not an ethical sentence, right?). And on this fundamental point, it seems to me, never discussed in your texts? In any case, this point in the specified by you as a reference text link ignored A landscape of morality simple.
Until it can be shown, however, as an ethical proposition can follow from a natural science, every ethic with a eliminationist physicalism incompatible. Ethics is then completely independent of the natural sciences area. Will you then this strict form of physicalism maintained one must bring themselves to deny the existence of ethical principle. But what I appear conclusive, because of free will in eliminationist physicalism leaves no room left.
this way do not seem to go, right? Unfortunately, I understand your position to the specified quote of Mr Schmidt-Salomon's not speaking of a non-justifiable axiom of ethics. Clearly this axiom is not a natural scientific, and therefore not to be brought into line with physicalism. And the acceptance of this axiom is totally independent of each position on the science, of course, each exemption. It therefore does not make sense to me, where now the progress or advantage the ethical theory is supported by you?
I would be surprised and delighted me, would you take the trouble of clarifying facts and reply to it!
Sincerely,
Thomas Steinschneider
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Betsty Johnson Diaper Bag
relatively ignorant - but honest!
I almost did indeed mean that Giordano Bruno Foundation and Working Group Evolutionary Biology would passionately preach to the utilitarian. Finally, propagated by them-run Internet portal Evo magazine again and again and again the recent book by Sam Harris. But then I saw that the imprint both operations at once on the content of the contributions in Evo magazine distance. So seems the "objective ethics," a personal passion of the "senior editor" Andreas Mueller to be. And that is quite interesting. For here you see something you know well of religious people to ignore the enlightened humanist in his own ranks but happy and consistent since it does not fit well with the self-image: It is the believe what you want to be convinced. And especially the last part of the review of Harris' book Talking louder than the author might deliberately is. We find after a non-targeted sweeping blow against "feminist theories" (with such minor inaccuracies as the Board, the German government would spend money on "eco-feminism", although the intentioned professor teaches their nonsense at the University of Innsbruck) against and an ethical "relativism", as well as resistance to the insight that there could be a culture-sensitive theory of knowledge, a really exciting conclusion. For it seems to the author must have been aware that there are some logical objections to his favorite view of the world. And what of the self-taught fundamentalist does in such a situation? Exactly - the logic is nonsense, of course!
A sentence like he fresh from a Kreationistenwebsite could come! And while the author can not be further irritated by "logic games", I want to thank him for this wonderful self-expression!
Candy Bar Sayings. Asking To A Dance
for ever on the edge of the solar system
Today it happened! Drum roll ... Aaaand: Voyager 1 has reached to 17.4 billion km journey to the edge of the solar system! Incredible! But that report today unanimously time, the world , the star that Frankfurter Rundschau, and many more. Since the vote is already. Bravo.
Today it happened! Drum roll ... Aaaand: Voyager 1 has reached to 17.4 billion km journey to the edge of the solar system! Incredible! But that report today unanimously time, the world , the star that Frankfurter Rundschau, and many more. Since the vote is already. Bravo.
Only ... The edge of the solar system, Voyager 1 reached already in November 2003? It reported then at least the star (11/05/2003), the mirror (6.11.2003), the Süddeutsche (6.11.2003) and the FAZ (6.11. 2003).
And then Voyager 1 reached the edge of the solar system again in May 2005, read in The Standard (05/25/2005), the star (05/27/2005) or the World (05/29/2005).
But in space, surely the most remarkable things are possible. And I have even now in some way, a deja-vu . But what the heck:
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Dr And Mrs Vandertramp Paper
What are you talking about just the way ... and how much
Over and over again forces itself on one of the impression of many things and people is just too much reported, discussed and speculated . Just think of the case Kachelmann A rape charge against a weather presenter -... one would think that's enough for just a short message under "Miscellaneous" And yet this issue in the media seems almost omnipresent And a while ago it was Sarrazin, his theses, either stupid or repetitive, far too much, were much too often discussed as if the objective seemed to deserve. Now, however, such estimates, about which too much is said and reported, unfortunately, a very subjective issue, and some will probably come to a different personal view. How nice would it be if they had a factual, objective and clearly quantified measure of whether a subject or a person gets too much public attention or not! And such an unerring measure we want to build us now.
The values for the individual words line up roughly on a straight line. The scattering may indeed be quite large, but you can clearly see in what area of the Frequency-Importance chart you can expect typical terms. Let us call this area the sake of simplicity once the "main sequence". Our primitive criteria seem to be working so well. Before we can compare but now, where are the annoying terms like "tile man" or "Sarrazin" to refer to this diagram, we must dwell a little and look at the structure in the chart more closely.
These terms are in fact on a separate line and with the same meaning of the term at a lower frequency of use. Let us call this area a short time the "scientific branch". In a further thorough investigation should find even more determined structures. Consider, for example, look at the terms related to sexuality and eroticism. Certainly should be used much more frequently than their objective meaning can justify, and therefore grouped in the chart above. But we can chart the ever divided into two areas: 
What is even more striking that the main sequence and the branch of science with great meanings in the shaded area, seem to run together. Here it comes to a kind of "saturation": The words of the highest importance only to come to the hundred languages in Wikipedia. Although it claims to exist in about 260 languages, but we find no words with entries in more than one hundred languages. So here ends our scale of importance, and all curves must come together here. In the shaded area saturation, so we can make any reliable statements about the importance of terms.
Thus we come together prepared for the following Overview Diagram:
terms that are in this view above the limit of the main series are overrated in the sense that more is said about them and spoken, than their actual importance would justify. For terms below the main sequence is the opposite. 
Over and over again forces itself on one of the impression of many things and people is just too much reported, discussed and speculated . Just think of the case Kachelmann A rape charge against a weather presenter -... one would think that's enough for just a short message under "Miscellaneous" And yet this issue in the media seems almost omnipresent And a while ago it was Sarrazin, his theses, either stupid or repetitive, far too much, were much too often discussed as if the objective seemed to deserve. Now, however, such estimates, about which too much is said and reported, unfortunately, a very subjective issue, and some will probably come to a different personal view. How nice would it be if they had a factual, objective and clearly quantified measure of whether a subject or a person gets too much public attention or not! And such an unerring measure we want to build us now.
All you have to do is, for example, the frequency of use of a term to apply to its importance. Then we could examine the context in which the normal Tag typically move Sun And find you could fall out what terms, or because, in terms of their importance too much or talk too much about them.
How to obtain the frequency of occurrence of a term is still quite clear. You could count, for example, how many times the corresponding term in newspapers. This is somewhat cumbersome. So let's do it here just once and take just the number of hits in a Google search as a measure of the frequency of use. To avoid confusion, we are looking here only on the German side and put the keyword in quotation marks.
But objectively the importance of a term Measured? Let us also quick. Let's say that a concept (or the object for which the term is) Wikipedia article has all the more languages, the bigger its importance for humanity. So we can reduce the number of languages in which there are Wikipedia article for a term to be determined measure of the importance of the concept as an easy take.
now one or the other certainly want to argue that these two really very rough and primitive criteria for the use frequency and meaning of a word his. And that may be, but we see about that, whether these criteria are not doing it already! If they are good size, then one should expect a correlation between them. Because the more important a concept, the more you should be talking about him, too, the larger should therefore be a frequency of use. Let us therefore once a set of randomly selected words from everyday language, frequently used words such as "house" or "love", to more often used as "gherkins" or "knuckle". For all these words, we determine the frequency of occurrence and importance. If we then apply two numbers for each word against each other, one should not expect a random distribution, but a relationship between two variables. And as for some strange reason, things like word frequencies etc. gladly obey power laws, we take the values in a double-logarithmic diagram, where should we expect a straight line. And indeed,
The values for the individual words line up roughly on a straight line. The scattering may indeed be quite large, but you can clearly see in what area of the Frequency-Importance chart you can expect typical terms. Let us call this area the sake of simplicity once the "main sequence". Our primitive criteria seem to be working so well. Before we can compare but now, where are the annoying terms like "tile man" or "Sarrazin" to refer to this diagram, we must dwell a little and look at the structure in the chart more closely. It's Never Off course, that all terms in the same "main sequence" are. Take, for example, once terms from the scientific-technical field. Such terms may sometimes have a very great importance, although they are still rarely used. The words "Lithium" and "molybdenum" as used is determined not significantly more often than the word "gherkin" even though the former in their economic and technological importance of the gherkins considerably exceed. So let's, a number of terms in the fields of physics, chemistry, astronomy and geology and take to see where these words are in the chart. If we add this in red, it looks like this:
These terms are in fact on a separate line and with the same meaning of the term at a lower frequency of use. Let us call this area a short time the "scientific branch". In a further thorough investigation should find even more determined structures. Consider, for example, look at the terms related to sexuality and eroticism. Certainly should be used much more frequently than their objective meaning can justify, and therefore grouped in the chart above. But we can chart the ever divided into two areas: 
What is even more striking that the main sequence and the branch of science with great meanings in the shaded area, seem to run together. Here it comes to a kind of "saturation": The words of the highest importance only to come to the hundred languages in Wikipedia. Although it claims to exist in about 260 languages, but we find no words with entries in more than one hundred languages. So here ends our scale of importance, and all curves must come together here. In the shaded area saturation, so we can make any reliable statements about the importance of terms. Thus we come together prepared for the following Overview Diagram:
terms that are in this view above the limit of the main series are overrated in the sense that more is said about them and spoken, than their actual importance would justify. For terms below the main sequence is the opposite. Now we have to ensure that the typical celebrity to a fall occur not particularly present, with the main sequence together, and not a separate region populate the chart. So let's take a number of German celebrities with different degrees of awareness and (not to offend anyone personally want to) different meanings. Let's take Benedict XVI, the doctors, Rammstein, Herbert Grönemeyer, Stefan Raab, Herbert Feuerstein, Marie Gruber and Sebastian Koch, and we carry them in blue one in the overview diagram: 
investigated over the whole range of meanings of words all fall squarely within the boundaries of the main sequence.
investigated over the whole range of meanings of words all fall squarely within the boundaries of the main sequence. Now finally we can some times feels like plagues of public life hernehmen and will add it to the chart! So let's take time Kachelmann, Sarrazin and Franz Josef Wagner, and who we do in red: 
And so we have it actually and finally officially and irrevocably! Franz Josef Wagner is slightly above the main sequence and is so just now to present in public discussions. Tile man and Sarrazin, however are well above the main sequence. Their names will be used several times more frequently than it would justify their meanings!
So what can we say more? I should perhaps, the entire list subsequent filing with words that I used for the determination of the main sequence and of the discipline. And sometimes silent otherwise rather ...
And so we have it actually and finally officially and irrevocably! Franz Josef Wagner is slightly above the main sequence and is so just now to present in public discussions. Tile man and Sarrazin, however are well above the main sequence. Their names will be used several times more frequently than it would justify their meanings! So what can we say more? I should perhaps, the entire list subsequent filing with words that I used for the determination of the main sequence and of the discipline. And sometimes silent otherwise rather ...
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Diagram Parts Of A Digital Slr Camera
opening in the dark dusty blue and dawn. You and he speak a silent language
It rose to a dove-gray afternoon, the color is slowly transformed into the grayish, off the train. The last sunlight of the short day level even with the clouds, who wanted to push vigorously to the fore. It was the calm before a storm, which made every step seem reasonable. She turned westward to the blaze at the sky, appear so because they would not want to miss. Who would win, the last sun rays or the first rain drops? Behind her were the hours of travel, before her meeting. She wrapped her gray shawl around and looked several times with her blue eyes in the known direction.
He had arrived in the first morning at the airport. The sky was still intact and it was apparent that the birds are enjoying their freedom. It was still night was when he got up, and now he was glad that he slowly embraced the light of day. He enjoyed watching the birds in the sky, as they drew their districts and their flights could be next. He was miserable, with its Bag in his hand and his hat on his head. It would be an ordeal. But he was ready. Deeply, he sucked the air into his tortured lungs before he boarded the plane that would take him to the old country.
She ran without their luggage through the old streets. She hoped that she would be admitted. The opening times were not familiar to her. She knew the system only from the time when it was still lived in it. As there was a now a lively, industrious and hard today. As the time flows still moving, the future is the present approached again and again and give birth through them and let fuel before it became the past. Now it was only the Review - a look back. Everything had become past, present and future long since died away out of reach. The indirect life had stopped, the system bared her walls for sightseeing purposes - for a small admission fee.
He fell asleep after the departure of the aircraft. Weird dreams penetrated his heart. He was dizzy. When he awoke he knew that he had received an important message. How could he remember what was it? Panic swept over him. He looked around and saw to the passengers. None of them had ever seen before. He had lost his sense of time and he did not know where he was. In this miserable Condition, which he pushed to its thoughtlessness, he closed his eyes again, to escape the past and the future in another dream.
you ... ... He
dusty blue and dawn. 
It rose to a dove-gray afternoon, the color is slowly transformed into the grayish, off the train. The last sunlight of the short day level even with the clouds, who wanted to push vigorously to the fore. It was the calm before a storm, which made every step seem reasonable. She turned westward to the blaze at the sky, appear so because they would not want to miss. Who would win, the last sun rays or the first rain drops? Behind her were the hours of travel, before her meeting. She wrapped her gray shawl around and looked several times with her blue eyes in the known direction.
He had arrived in the first morning at the airport. The sky was still intact and it was apparent that the birds are enjoying their freedom. It was still night was when he got up, and now he was glad that he slowly embraced the light of day. He enjoyed watching the birds in the sky, as they drew their districts and their flights could be next. He was miserable, with its Bag in his hand and his hat on his head. It would be an ordeal. But he was ready. Deeply, he sucked the air into his tortured lungs before he boarded the plane that would take him to the old country.
She ran without their luggage through the old streets. She hoped that she would be admitted. The opening times were not familiar to her. She knew the system only from the time when it was still lived in it. As there was a now a lively, industrious and hard today. As the time flows still moving, the future is the present approached again and again and give birth through them and let fuel before it became the past. Now it was only the Review - a look back. Everything had become past, present and future long since died away out of reach. The indirect life had stopped, the system bared her walls for sightseeing purposes - for a small admission fee.
He fell asleep after the departure of the aircraft. Weird dreams penetrated his heart. He was dizzy. When he awoke he knew that he had received an important message. How could he remember what was it? Panic swept over him. He looked around and saw to the passengers. None of them had ever seen before. He had lost his sense of time and he did not know where he was. In this miserable Condition, which he pushed to its thoughtlessness, he closed his eyes again, to escape the past and the future in another dream.
you ... ... He
dusty blue and dawn.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
How Do You Get Rust Off Iceskates
The right song at the right time
After I was now impossible for weeks, it is about time wegzubloggen all the important considerations on the situation of the world that have so accumulated. And this is first and foremost a musical affair. For a while ago I heard as background music in the mall to the track Where the wild roses grow by Kylie Minogue and Nick Cave. And so soft and romantic song that may come therefore, I have my doubts whether it is a good accompaniment to the shops. For if one pays attention to the text one can understand that it is the song about a woman who is a lover with a stone and placed in a river. In France, which is a country where the people understand their mother tongue to absolutely nothing in the situation, I even once as a supermarket in the song Fire Water Burn by the Bloodhound Gang Purchasing background heard. And since it is clearly audible motherfucker rows
After I was now impossible for weeks, it is about time wegzubloggen all the important considerations on the situation of the world that have so accumulated. And this is first and foremost a musical affair. For a while ago I heard as background music in the mall to the track Where the wild roses grow by Kylie Minogue and Nick Cave. And so soft and romantic song that may come therefore, I have my doubts whether it is a good accompaniment to the shops. For if one pays attention to the text one can understand that it is the song about a woman who is a lover with a stone and placed in a river. In France, which is a country where the people understand their mother tongue to absolutely nothing in the situation, I even once as a supermarket in the song Fire Water Burn by the Bloodhound Gang Purchasing background heard. And since it is clearly audible motherfucker rows
We do not need no water let the motherfucker burnAnd if you about the roughly equivalent but understandable lines "Burn, cunt, burn" to play in a supermarket would? And recently I was completely taken aback by the private radio. On a car trip, I heard, really Hasta Siempre Comandante Che Guevara Nathalie Cardone of - a decent song on Revolution Cherie FM, a station owned by the NRJ Group! Apparently, so now everything goes! Since I'm curious if you still hear one day, as the elevators in KaDeWe the International be sprinkled or right now at Christmas, Merry Christmas with of the Fantastic Four. I would not be surprised even more ...
Burn, burn
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)