Fan Is Running But No Heat

Joke of the Week

Losing Weight On Ready Brek

Birthday: Dear Lothar,

today is your birthday. It is not the landmark anniversary, the great, no, is that until next year, it's just a normal birthday today, one who likes to hide behind weighty numbers. And just because I want to congratulate you most warmly and wish you all the best. A Birth Day reminds us of the day we were born. Year after year. Again and again. And we are not getting any younger, but getting older, year after year. How many years have given us, we do not know. But we can celebrate what we know, namely, that today is your birthday!

This need not be have been easy, then, in this troubled time. For you to come into the world, for your mother - my grandmother - to release up to their 40th Birthday. Your brother - my father - at that time was almost two, he also will not remember your birth. And your father - my grandfather - if he was ever in the area? Could he even attend the birth of his second son? I have never met him, and you had him briefly - he died when you were seven years old.

All these things I do not know from personal experience, I was not there. I only know stories about it, have ideas about. We have only learned much later. Since you were already grown up. You have been in southern Germany lived - the great "journey" was behind you, the many difficult years. Do you needed more time you leave your home, you make on unfamiliar routes and looking at where could you get it. When I was born and you "uncle" are peace in the land and the houses had been rebuilt and freshly painted.

Our paths have not crossed often. No, perhaps because the rich fingers of my hands. But I remember a visit with you in Berlin. Renate whether that time is still studying, or already was done, I do not know. But we have visited. I was a child. It is a distant memory. More sense as an image. My brother is sure it must have been. And my parents.

You were a bearded, portly man, then, was to me both strange and familiar, I hardly "knew" and had but the same eyes as my father. There was a stranger and there was a familiarity to feel the same. I remember a black wall in your apartment, to masks and all sorts of strange objects they had. I found the adventurous and a bit scary.

I also remember that the "Westphalian Road", was in you lived - which I found strange. For I knew that the state in which I lived (North)-Westphalia said - and that was far away from Berlin. Perhaps, but this particular street name also made a connection, at least I imagined that took her from us to you.

You've always led an unusual life. The adult world in my circle rumors about it. But I could not do anything with because I did not know what that meant. Once you have been for a long time on a world tour. And since you have euern hangover - what was his name, he was black! - Brought to my grandmother in Tübingen. She has cared for him. And planted on her windowsill for Mühlstraße out a flower pot with grass - so the cat could have something fresh to eat. Also

I was at that time with her in a jeans shop at the station in Tübingen - I was still so small that jeans in my life did not matter - and we bought a pair of pants for you, which we sent to you then, in a packet. I loved it.

Yes, we've really seen only rarely. But when I'll finally, just a few years, as have before visited on the North Sea, and saw how beautiful and well equipped to provide your house and how much did you connected with it, what a great artist you like, as I have understand what it means to be artistic in life. The marriage between art and science is certainly not easy and the distance between the two is not like a straight road ahead of us, but it holds just what we may call the unfathomable mystery of life and beautiful. Being human means to be creative - and you symbolisierst for me.

Renate's life was drawing to a close back then - and I'm so glad I have you summarily visited yet! - And now you're already the fifth time on your birthday alone. How can it be? Maybe you get used to being alone - maybe not. It will be quiet up there, with you in the north - on your birthday. There is a lot to complain about, but the sun every morning is for us all. And

now when I think of you, I think of Joseph Beuys. I think of a traditional text from him - I have given him the other day - but the is about how we can stay inside always an artist. All that is external to you may not be possible, but inside I wish you that you can feel the lightness that gives us life here on earth. Glad you're here, Lothar, and once again, congratulations on your birthday today!
your niece Sophie

How to be an artist?

Let yourself fall to observe
learn snakes
plant impossible gardens. Invite someone

Dangerous to tea,
make small marks
say "Yes" and
distribute them anywhere in your house.
Become a friend of
freedom and uncertainty.
Look forward to dreams.
wines with movies,
Swayer as high as you can
with your swing in the moonlight.
care different moods,
refuse to be "responsible,"
do it for love.
belief in witchcraft,
laugh a lot,
bathe in the moonlight.
dreams wild fanciful dreams,
draw on the walls.
Read each day.
Imagine
you'd be charmed,
giggle with Children
listen to old people.
games entertain with everything
the child in you, you are innocent
,
build a castle made of blankets,
get wet,
hug trees,
write love letters.

Joseph Beuys

Kates Playground Tim Hortons

a hollow world of simulations

On many a great question of humanity sometimes suggested answers that sound first to spectacular new knowledge, but basically contribute nothing to answer the question. An example from the natural sciences could be the panspermia. This hypothesis answers the question of where and how life arose on Earth so that life came to one or the other way from space to Earth. Such a proposal seems to stimulate the human imagination much, for this hypothesis finds time to time mention. She moves the question of how life originated on Earth, only then, as life anywhere else was (and how exactly it could come here). And there are no references to the observation of extraterrestrial origin of life, it stays in the panspermia in a nice, but useless intellectual gimmick.

is naturally much worse the situation when one moves from the science rather philosophic hypotheses. Such a hypothesis is that of the "simulated reality". Here the question of the true nature and purpose of life is answered in the statement that the world and we were all just a "computer simulation" of another advanced civilization. That may be, but it may be just as well that we're all just characters in the dream of a sky-blue giraffe. Interestingly, but will include a Philosphieprofessor Nick Bostrom , the first hypothesis quite debatable, but those of the giraffe probably not. And that gives a clue to the significance of "simulated reality". For while a representative of a culture in which dreams and giraffes play a role, probably the speculation about the dream of the giraffe considered worthwhile to find a representative of a culture in which computers and computer simulations play a major role, the hypothesis of the computer-simulated reality interesting. When one thinks here once more, then let the central arguments against the atheists have been right the religions, also oppose the hypothesis of the simulated reality. If the religious image of God accused of just an "extrapolation" to be more human interests and abilities, so this is more evident for the "simulated reality". In religion, the human power to the omnipotence of a hypothetical deity is expanded. In the "simulated reality" of the modern human ability for the computer simulation for unlimited simulation capability of a hypothetical civilization is removed. While religion assumes that the fictional deity of course has an interest in humanity and its problems, it is exactly the same thing invented for the higher civilization the "simulated reality". Values and knowledge of religion and the "simulated reality" and both are rather superficial. For the chain of asking for the "why", the religion with a "God wills it nunmal so" stop that "simulated reality" can end up with a "so nunmal the simulation further inquiries.

We see as fast, where the hypothesis of the simulated reality belongs: to inner world and the metaphysical theory solipsism in the store room nice but useless gadgets, and even there calmly in the back shelf. That would be it. If not my favorite reason simulation on the Web, Enlightenment 2.0 (unfortunately, it deals almost exclusively with political propaganda, and hardly with pseudo philosophy ...) wanted to sell , just the "simulated reality" as best argument for the existence of God . And once again presented an atheist in a purely religious in nature as a rational argument. But wanted to point out that one could be sure that once the relexartige "Once again the nonsense of atheism as a religion!" trigger. Hopeless. But in the end no one can even exclude a bug in the current reality simulation!

Gloryholesorlando Iocations

life lines and railway networks. The train of life

Some trains go a long, long way. Continuous from south to north Germany, from Brussels to Moscow, from Paris to Vienna. They begin their route at a particular time and at a certain place. Some trains go by, one day you do not even need. But of course that is not always so. Often times you have to overcome in certain places a detention time. You have to change - if you want to achieve a goal. But there are also trains, the long, long distances get it over with, and where they can remain seated.

The picture of the long train ride is a metaphor for life. We know when and where we entered - in this life. In any event, we were told that. And we have a piece of paper on which it is stated. But we get to know neither where we - I mean, get off final - yet where we are. I mean, how much of our lives the way we have been left behind, and how much still lies ahead. Not to mention the final destination station. We are on the long journey through our lives - and yet know not know when and where and how it ends. Maybe we'll get past the unknown land of which we suspect yet.

On some sections of the journey we are sitting alone in the compartment. We sleep doze or dream in front of us. Every now and then runs a passenger past us, sometimes in one direction, sometimes in the other. Sometimes we know each other will only see the. Then comes the conductor. If he is attentive, he does not insist on seeing our ticket to do more often. Occasionally, however, a change of personnel carried out, then we must show us again and again and prove that we can really ride on this route.

Sometimes the Train fully. A noisy bowling club travels. Or a school class. Or, or, or. But we would not always alone. Sometimes we meet someone we know and stay a piece together. Or we meet someone. Or watching someone. Or find that someone has apparently the same goal. Sometimes the train is full of crack - occupied every seat and the luggage is stacked also in progress. Here and there even have to be traveling - no matter at what speed. We often know of them do not know where they are joined - and where they want.

Sometimes the train but only moderately busy. We look around and see the people who are traveling. See someone there, reading in a book there someone who has to look out the window, sleeping, or is also looking around. Travelled to have any age, even very small infants to travel by train - and even old people, equipped with a walking stick, or a helper on the side. Young, old, men, women, children. Any nationality can be represented - and so also the conductor endeavor even in English the next target pass by, so we all understand ...

trains run every day - as we live each day. And they go at all hours - even at night. But of course, in every season. There are short and long trains, fast and slow. Sometimes they even go on the road direction. You can cross national borders, bridges and go through tunnels. Germany is a powerful network of routes through it, which brings us to any place we want. Paths are many.

The drivers we have to do nothing as fellow passengers. From him we let go. To him we trust. We need well. Even if he sometimes stops in the open field. If he moves slowly, or hurtling through the countryside. Sometimes we hear the train manager to say something, by the loudspeaker announcement. He then gives a little known regarding the trip. We as travelers him but listen. In direct contact are not we.

On my train there is now a little gray and wet. It is good that is being heated, and that the board bistro is filled with all sorts of goodies. A little music would do well, however - it's pretty quiet here. Or a stimulating conversation with a fellow traveler - to get other perspectives. How about with you in your cabin, you will travel alone or with others? What you see when you look out euerm train window?

Ararza Watch Streaming

joke of the week

Queengreatest Hits 11high Definition 24bit/96khz

Freud, joyless

The sad fact, that were killed on the last Friday of German soldiers in Afghanistan (or "fallen" are?) plays in the affair of the thesis of Defense tried to Guttenberg a significant role. It was this incident (or "this battle"?) , the (that) the Minister prompted spontaneously in the hallway on Friday to explain some journalists about his thesis. And to make it unpleasant to snub capital journalists . Moreover, the death of these soldiers will always be used as evidence that Journalists and opposition politicians care about unimportant footnotes in academic texts were instead to focus on important things like death for the fatherland. Than when it comes to the footnotes of a thesis was, and not the far more important question of how exactly it takes the person of Defense Minister of the Federal Republic of Germany with the truth as such! Were for the defense of Mr. Guttenberg So perished in a fairly convenient time soldiers from this now even mentioned in the Bundestag. And with the gracious but ignored words

"It is known that, I flew to Afghanistan on Wednesday afternoon, Wednesday to Thursday Afghanistan was, and against the background that we had incidents on Friday, I have to describe here, which were far from unpleasant incidents am, I could look at the weekend for the first time with this work ... "

( Video third MoD Q03 , by minute around 00:06:00).

Well, at this point at least you can believe that he made this statement unconscious. But sometimes, as today, can a one joy shear slip of the tongue but then really scare before the rest of humanity of a politician



Addendum 24.2:!.
from the "anything but unpleasant incidents" were Minutes then it is anything but pleasing incidents.

Ap Biology Taster Lab

joke of the week

How Come I Cant See My Friend On Oovoo

single rooms and dormitories. Sleep, death and body

Recently I read a sentence. When Juli Zeh. It reads: "What do sleep and death together, is the fact that both ready for their guests only single rooms. You can take anybody. "It has taken me. Not because I do not "know" would have, no, that fact is somehow known. But this looseness with which this sentence is the middle of a novel, the word choice that evokes a spa-hotel, objectivity and tragedy together, combine the insurmountable barriers makes visible. Between life and death, between waking and sleeping, between me and thee. Although I share my life with other people, even the bed, now sleep and dies but each in isolation.

a guest you are on time. Arrival and departure are part of the guest to be. The only variable is the duration of the stay. To live on earth we need a body. By the way, a single room. Visit to receive is possible for a short time. But nothing more. Every night, we dive for many hours into what we call sleep. And if our sleep is disturbed or interrupted - that "in-my-be single" - we are not happy in the morning, sometimes not for the day in the group room equipped so well.

to have a body to sink into sleep every night and kick some point the face of death - once again to be born, to come back - we call life. As human beings live on Earth. The contrast between a loneliness, a for-itself, just for me and with me, his stop me in my own single room and the "concerns the world, "could not be greater. The concerns of the world, the other, the fellow human beings needs, the needs together and to just not be alone, to do something together to achieve and produce are universal human needs that we all know.

The world is full of singles. Some are next to each other, one above the other, each other or even remotely close to each other. The whole thing makes sense only when we are able to look at the entire building, to penetrate the texture, to name possibilities and impossibilities - may convert and track targets. External and internal. What are actually procure various individual rooms, as they are established? A glance, you can venture into it so again. And what are the windows of several rooms from the outside? Do they have curtains, they are open or closed, they may be painted?

It is said that apart from the body and a soul there. And a mind. And that the two could move more freely. Can escape the night or after the death of the single rooms to meet your peers. You can bring out-come and remove new and old, seeing a fresh wind. They take part in the big hotel on that, which means earth or world, as to that which we the unknown Dark call the inevitable gap.

very thing which the earth being full of singles, this collection of completed individuals who are left to sleep and death, has little to offer the spiritual world. This provides only seen from the Earth like, applies only to the transitions. There are on a spiritual level, only a group room, a large dormitory - no room, you could refer to themselves. Everything runs into each other, here the connections are obvious, the holes and urgent threats. Here, new projects were established, and appointments are made, decisions taken - then on the ground, in the shadows and fight be discharged with the single. Experience, we can only make a single room, not in the dormitory - there is something called insights.

And also applies to the sleep that we are as seen from the earth and our fellow human beings in a locked single rooms - from the big picture but of view, get out of the large group room food. Spiritual food - to be ready for the day in the earthly singles. And if we ask each other then in the morning as we slept and how we are, we ask about the nature of the single.

this in mind: "How are you? Would like to do something? "

Juli Zeh: reeds. btb-Verlag, 2009. P. 374

What Type Of Wood To Use For A Bed Frame

only the tip of the Guttenberg!

New worse suspicion!

Hat Dr. jur. temp. Guttenberg not only plagiarized in his dissertation?

up to date remains one here.

Bollywood Actress Showing Breastsin The Party

Nothing new since Assurbanipal

Guttenberg cheated! Guttenberg has cheated! No, what a petty, childish posturing in the left media, just because the baron a few pages of his hundreds of Pages has a strong and "with highest praise" completed thesis copied verbatim somewhere making without recognizable.

has not been the Koran

( Sura 11, 41 : "Until then, there comes Our Command, and break out the waves (the Earth) Since We shall say." Embark therein, of each kind two, a female, and your family except those against whom the Word has already gone, and the faithful. "But only a few believed (and living) with him.")

here and there in the Bible

(Gen 6:18 -19: "With you, but I close my covenant Go into the ark, you, your sons. your wife and your sons' wives! Of all that grows out of all beings meat, run two in the ark, to keep them alive with thee; each one male and one female they shall be ")

depreciated And has not the Bible already.? from the Gilgamesh epic

(11th panel : "drawing from the house, build a ship, driving wealth, life jag to give up possession, but keeping them all kinds of animated life Heb seeds into the ship! ")

written off? Exactly. And all this without mentioning the source! Even the great double-T beam Ludwig Wittgenstein has in the preface to Tractatus openly known

"Yes, what I have written here makes in detail did not claim to novelty, and therefore I give no sources, because it is indifferent to me whether what I thought thought before me by someone else. "

we had made this a genius like Wittgenstein ever criticized for? Why, then whipping the largest and most brilliant war minister we have ever had such a triviality into a scandal high? Just because it is reproduced verbatim? Honestly - when an artist like Guttenberg had wasted his valuable time trying to reword it simply would be to work thereby become better? Exactly.

How Much Is Ostrich Steaks

The open space between author and reader. Question Collection III

"I" am sitting at my desk and let my slide view through the window outside. The clouds hang low. It is gray, cold and wet. This can be seen. But also felt. The sunlight hardly penetrates through the clouds and it begins to dawn again. I am glad that the stove is burning behind me. The heat reached me. Unfortunately I can not write that the sky is blue and the world is white - I would have liked to. But I've made today to not put me into the world of literary imagination, but I deal with earthly and real facts to share.

What are my literary ego, perhaps I would have to even put in the plural form (...), and my everyday life I have in common? As they go forth apart? When I discussed with students a work that is in the first-person writing, for example, "Stiller by Max Frisch, then often is a very special silence occurred when the students have actually understood that it is the self- narrator is not the author, but that the narrative "I" and the author are two different instances.

A first-person perspective is provided nearby. Between author and reader - the text content. Before all, between the I-figure and readers - because between these two starts to vibrate slightly. If the reader of a story that is written in first person perspective, connects with the content, he is very close to the action. He is there. Inside. The power of thought, imagination and settle pass into the incident. It's something that the reader is part of the story. The literary self and the ego of the reader to merge with each other. I - as a reader - I read through the story and I travel with the literary with - whereas it is always on the go - I come and I are, for the story, very close.

The students have noticed how infinite Opportunities we have as human beings in our conception of life to let things come to be constructive, bold and unsubstantiated - far beyond the physical reality of a people. We can be creative and produce something set up, draw, create, constitute, construct. Not infrequently, relaxing at these moments of consciousness a conversation about truth. to put on reality, reality, about the power of imagination and the ability with words mountains. It was the "cut point man" in the center. Between heaven and hell. Between the so-called reality and the world of poetry. Between me and you. Between inside and outside.

If any person perspective would relate solely to the author or the author, there would be no open literary space. The writing I would not be a creator, it could not produce I described. There were no wounds between you and me, no point of contact. Creativity would be limited, restricted, nothing new could happen. In this context, I am a supporter of constructivism.

"You" is at her desk and her look makes its way through the window outside. Not a cloud to be seen. The sky is blue, the air looks warm and dry. What to feel connected to a new reality, what is true remains open. She does not know what she sees. The sunlight reached them with force and it is light, bright light and again She is glad that it's so warm, it needs no stove - but she's cold. Especially now when they write that the sky is gray and the world is dark - but she does not want, it almost refuses. Because before you today to tell something of their literary self - fantasy and facts of real life are there not to keep them apart, prospects do not make sense anymore.

questions from me to you
What I touch you, when I talk about me?
I Tell me if I am looking tell?

questions of you to trust me
Why reader and author?
What does the reader for the author?

observer questions
How would describe the situation from a different perspective?
How can comment on word games?

content issues
if what remains is only the AS variable - does this change the content?
What happens when subject and object exchange their places?

S60 Volvos And Heater Core Problems

Scent of a Woman

Just now, it not half an hour ago, something happened to me is absolutely fantastic! I walk down the street back home, and I'm almost there when my two young women I meet. And these two women interrupt their conversation abruptly. You look at me, turn around for me, and I throw them both so as to blatantly greedy eyes, as I have never dreamed of me! Those eyes! As she observed on her red lips easily! And as they giggled and whispered to each other when they noticed that they both had the same thought! For a few seconds of my life, I would not even want to trade places with George Clooney! And the best thing about this experience is: I know what was my success! I am therefore able to enjoy it again. One need only simple if one's Pizza Caprese with home, close the box lid not. And if you are then wrapped in very hot, fresh pizza scent, then one must hope, of course, still on two starved young ladies ...

Cheap Prindle Catamaran Parts

homeopath proves that effect even without detectable brain!

On this Saturday organized in German-speaking the Society for the Scientific Investigation of Para-sciences the 10:23 action. The participants related swallow an "overdose" of homeopathic remedies - many times the "normal" administered Quantity. They want to show that happened with the participants simply do nothing, after all, the whole of homeopathy is nothing but humbug. A simple PR campaign against the homeopaths? Sure, it started as such. But then the German central association of homeopathic doctors in his body " Homeopathic news " based very much in advance position. And so that action can ever won a splendid self-exposure for itself and against its occurrence was a smash hit! As a small service for readers here the main points of the homeopaths statement in a clear language were translated

Skeptics love!

Your annoying, petty nitpickers!

It's honorable that you do not believe everything that is set before them.

your eternal nagging can go one better than the bag. But what can you do other than a good face?

Diluted that something as yet to have any effect is difficult to reconcile with common sense.

Strictly speaking, not at all. But we, as homeopaths do not have anyway to do with healthy people!

homeopaths claim that high powers produce a substance-specific effect, they do not claim that this is a pharmacological effect.

We claim that you get when you go by car, by the agency, we do not claim that it has something to do with transportation. As I said, we claim already no sense for us!

These effects may be of pharmacological effects differ significantly and are strongly influenced individual and opposed to the pharmacological effects of the substance in common.

If we do not just say exactly what will be the effect, then, after all, everything that happened, as interpreted by the homeopathic remedies cause!

The probability that one or another phenomenon occurs, with more frequent intake is much higher.

If you are taking our remedies for long enough, then eventually there something to happen to you. And this is of course due to the remedies! This proves that homeopathy works!

If no symptoms occur, could this because be that the remedy does not suit them.

partout will happen if nothing proves this .. not that homeopathy does not work!

In this case, they could repeat the experiment with another agent.

will eventually happen to have something with them! And if they swallow more remedies, then shown many times: homeopathy works!

content is the so-called overdose of complete nonsense, since with high potency does not matter whether 2 or 500 globules are brought to them.

yet more exactly, it does not matter whether 0 or 500 globules are brought to them. But to act seriously, we prescribe to our patients, of course, still a certain number of globules per day, together with detailed instructions for taking procedure.

The homeopathic drug tests Mitel work is well documented and confirmed in double blind studies.

Although I have just said that access is not so vile a scientific method or even common sense in homeopathy. But I write something still remains of double-blind studies with a picture of myself For the casual reader always something to hang - be it that homeopathy is scientifically confirmed, except that they can not be tested scientifically. Smart, eh? As can keep your stupid skeptic no more ...!

Yes, even more clearly, the "homeopathic doctors" do not really say that they piss their patients. And so also the conscience is relieved: who is so stupid that he even now wants to spend his money on globules ... it really deserves no better!

Lost Savings Bond Search

Anna and her narrator in the train. Question Collection II

Anna enters the ICE and will be looking for a place. Right sits an old lady who flips nervously in a magazine. She has a wrinkled face, rouged lips and a Perm hair. Whether she goes to visit her son, who moved to the other end of Germany to escape it? Anna sees only the outside of the woman and move on. The train is open only moderately. Over there, on the table for four sits a young man in torn jeans and with a big backpack on the side seat. The stereotype of a young man, then, draws for his ideals even with heavy luggage through the country. Whether he travels with a cheap ticket and is on his way to a resistance camp?

Anna does not know where they should sit down. The claims at least its narrator - which in this respect, violence, power and control over them. It is she who breathes into her life, their lives distorted or just moves - it is her literary voice, and one that sends them this way or that way along. (Why does Anna do not speak, do not do what they want?) Where the front sit two businesswomen with laptops, cell phones, painted nails and faces important - obviously they trust each other just last night on the secrets. The two ladies are women who move on the stage of society - or at least do Sun Whether you have questions unanswered in their hearts?

Anna stops. The train has reached a rapid pace and jerks only gently. She is still undecided. She looks Occasional seated passengers - no one wants something to do with someone else, everyone just sitting passengers is ostensibly his bag on the adjacent seat so no one has the idea to sit down with him - and do not know where is their place. Just like in life. You can sit down anywhere. The faces, whose face was streaked they are withdrawn. In one way or another. The innocent smile to the outside is the nagging question inside.

inside and outside separated by a threshold. Sometimes it is insurmountable. Anna is still standing in the aisle of the carriage 28 and moves into the future. Full steam ahead. The narrator gives up hope that it would accept a place sits down and finally sit back - after that date. Finally, there but for Anna a lot to think, to make decisions. The seats offer all in the same impartial way - they are blue. But it is obvious to them whether they are possessed or not.

As the narrator drew her attention back to Anna, she was engrossed in conversation. With a flutist, was their view - to think, anyway. Anna spoke a language that did not understand the narrator. Clearly trying to attract their attention to her somehow to make them realize that they should change the language, so that they understand something ... but her courage waned when they saw what was entered into conversation with Anna area of the unknown. Because they would never enter it. This threshold was plain impassable.

you turned away. A little offended. pushed back on itself. The narrator sat in the board Bistro and closed his eyes. The smell of pork cutlets could be ignored. But the nagging desire for closeness not. Anna had split off from it. She could not reach on this trip. And that's why she decided to get off at the next station without them.

• Questions to the outside:
Who is Anna and how they look? What do
train?
are traveling together in misfortune?
An onboard bistro - a Mysterienort?
Why are there locked traveling companions?

• Questions to the inside:
What happens when I walk in a moving train in the opposite direction?
Why do I want Anna to be close to what she has to do with me?
I know why I do certain things and not doing certain things?
How is me today anyway?
tell me what the many faces that I see?

• Ask the narrator:
What happens if I ignore Anna in my story?
And how will behave Anna, when she talks to me again?
Who belongs to Anna, who is missing? Why Anna
moves at all by train, where she is on the way?
As Anna came into my life and what they want there?

• Ask Anna:
Why should I answer the questions of the narrator?
How do I keep up my money?
My right foot is cold, why not my left?
Will I arrive on time, I will have enough time?
Did I actually sent the letter?

Rash Following Waxing

The living fossils of the Enlightenment

A well-known, but basically it amazing phenomenon is that some people thought outdated building simply does not want to die, even if the spirit world is already quite a bit moved. Just think of times in Communism: a theory that is about as forward-looking as the tax return from three years ago. And yet there is also today in Germany or the handful of those who dream of the next revolution. Another such program is the philosophical movement of Enlightenment. Only this is not how communism failed impressive, but quite the opposite. The program of education has been met in Germany at least quasi. Only so much, how some people would have hoped for them is probably not yet gotten around it. Presumably this is the reason why some of the completion of the Enlightenment do not notice, and the community of the "humanist ", "free thinkers " and several small blogs on the dissemination of information have taken up the cause.

Good - the last village in southern Germany I would not put my hand in the fire. But if Germany is seen as a whole times, then one can speak of the spread of the Enlightenment, that output from the self-inflicted inability to use his intelligence without the guidance of others , are already impressed. Because education is education where the cause of the inability to use one's own understanding, the lack of courage and resolution is. Not in the lack of understanding. And the courage and resolution to make use of his own mind, it is lacking in Germany now than that! Pretty much everyone thinks they need to enjoy the fruits of his mind. And so eager to write blogs. Believers base their faith not with But the priest said ... but with I just can not think that everything here should be formed by chance ... , and it is passionately crafted personal small cross-over from Christianity and Buddhism. In every morning talk show to give the guests the conclusions of their minds shamelessly for the best. Finally, the education culminating in impressive views, as happened to myself already: If you for instance against the terse statement that a particular factual situation was natural, and obviously so and so, raises the objection that this matter maybe it was not so obvious, because after all, have personalities make as Leibniz or Kant considerable thought about it must. Then you get the answer that the Spartans call these considerations are all the same, he would rather trust to his own head. Indeed, in courage and resolution for use of your mind it is no longer lacking! The problem lies rather in the lack of understanding. And this is no longer so declared Matter of the Enlightenment.

we take the information that is than what it is: a necessary and unreacted historic step, but who had over-estimated the resources of understanding dramatically. What is needed now is a program that may be how to deal with the general lack of understanding. And since there has unfortunately not as convincing approaches.

How Fast Will A 20hp Outboard Go

Hegel Prize for disregard of logic - the awards ceremony!

It is finished! The winner of the first time conferred Hegel price is fixed for the disregard of logic !

Great was the excitement in the past few weeks! The

certain readers of this blog among the four candidates for the Hegel Prize off, and all one hundred twenty-six votes were counted. And the result, it is clear! But let the candidates by one.

With impressive 7.1% of the vote on the 4th Place: Federal Minister Dirk Niebel! For more, it has unfortunately not been enough. But he himself and his followers remains a consolation: A better result will enter a representative of the FDP in an election not soon!

third place with 14.3% of the vote goes to the sewage treatment plant operator Anton Stuck! Unfortunately, Mr. Stucki may ultimately decide not to fight price for the defiance of logic for itself. But here is We comforted optimize the great idea, the activity of microorganisms by the right music selection, is still far from great benefit to all mankind, be aware of the treatment plants beyond! Meanwhile, I sound for example, in my absence my bathroom in an endless loop of music of Xavier Naidoo. And there is now growing even more of the mold! Bigger prizes than intended because of the wait even on Mr. Stucki.

And this brings us to second place! With 19.8% of the vote it goes to the Austrian actor and comedian Roland Düringer! Congratulations on this good placement, by the terrific argument for the existence Aka God's "Life" deserved!

But now, finally, the winner! The prize for the best disregard of logic in 2010 is an impressive absolute majority of 58.7% to Austria! we believe happens when an accident that go straight to the second and first place in the competition to Vienna ... On the first place shows learned is learned, and the thousands of years! The representatives of God on earth, have once again demonstrated that they can range in defiance of logic so easy no one has the water! And we are proud to award the prize to first thing in such an important personality to be allowed. Congratulations to Christoph Cardinal Schönborn! applause! (Here at least five times a clap their hands!)

The prize has been awarded in a ceremony in the absence of Cardinal Schönborn.

as an equitable award presenter for the prize winner, the successful, and also extremely witty, damn good looking and relentlessly realistic self-assessment enabled Blogger Thomas S. to be won! The full eulogy with a critical assessment of the performance of the winner is obvious in the wording on This blog documents !

And at the ceremony at the subsequent party unofficial ceremony, visitors were able to discuss and special guests for a long time with a glass of port wine by the fireplace, the far-reaching implications of the logical and brilliant achievement of Cardinal Schönborn.

The prize committee congratulates all over again congratulate the winners, thank all who were involved interred in the vote, and there is no doubt that in 2011, worthy successors to the next Hegel seek price for the defiance of logic!

Good evening.

1.6 Cm Left Renal Cyst

eulogy to Cardinal Schönborn

a tribute to the Hegel Prize for the disregard of the log ik 2010

Thomas Steinschneider

Ladies and Gentlemen, Friends,

love today, we have a very special reason out together. Today we honor a man who has done for us, for all its people and for all generations to come out of the ordinary. I speak of course of Mr Christoph Maria Michael Hugo Damian Peter Adalbert Cardinal Schönborn. walking in the footsteps of his Lord Jesus Christ, this pastor decided on a frugal life of Humility and modesty to preserve the immortal souls of his sheep from the undoubtedly deserved eternal damnation. But his privation existence between Audi limousines, Bishop Palace and its television studio seemed to inspire him by God himself blown and so restless mind only. For not only does it pleased the Lord in heaven, to guard him with incontrovertible arguments against scientific delusions such as the theory of evolution . No, it was the dogs of the Lord even to open up in defense of the teachings of his donor rolls entirely new way of logical reasoning for all of humanity! And this last one, maybe his biggest act, we want today at least a small share of the credit can get that it deserves. Let me first quote again his excellent and seminal statement:

" If he celibacy would blame [the sexual abuse], then there should be no abuse in the family."

we do here and now, look at this solemn occasion, not the dirty occasion, to whom we owe this breakthrough in human thought - those damnable anti-religious left some media smear campaign against an institution that humanity owes nothing less than morality per se! Finally, know, the last upper Bavarian Catholic from the divine depth of his heart out with certainty that pagan and atheistic cultures used to eat the whole of humanity throughout history at Christmas their children, made possible by love mutual immanence of God the Father and God the Son did not realize and on television is nothing but tits and advertising for blähbauchreduzierenden brought yogurt. And now it is thanks to Cardinal Schönborn, that we owe to the Christianity of today is not only the morality but also one of the greatest advances in the venerable science of logic since Aristotle's Analytica Priora.

Let me elaborate on something performance of the cardinal received. First, we must note that behind the "debt" have hides in his testimony actually the negative formulation of a cause. If celibacy were the cause of sexual abuse, then there should be a sexual abuse in families, say it. Some will argue now want the high praise worthy winners but just "forgets" that there may be a matter for several reasons. And such small "forgotten" details are for the good of the salvation of the sheep in the Catholic Church so not that unusual. So where should this be calculated disregard of logic, will be awarded for the Cardinal Schönborn? To see this, we have to penetrate a little deeper into the guiding statements of the winner. To appreciate the excellent statement completely, we will try to formalize it logically. Since it obviously is not possible to combine logical facts, but only sets, we first need the facts, that "A", replace by the corresponding set, "A", . Have we done this once, we must first "his cause of" logical formalized, eg by using the concept of minimal theory : A factor A is if and causally relevant to another factor B if it is included in the antecedent of the theory of minimal B . (Of course, these are just the condition for direct causal relevance. With respect to the late hour I was here, this restriction allows them.) we remind ourselves what a minimal theory of B is. A minimal theory of B is an Doppelkonditional with a minimally necessary disjunction of minimally sufficient Terms of B the antecedent, and B in consequence, so that each factor in the antecedent of B at any extension of the Doppelkonditionals is maintained. For logic formalization, it is now only a small step. All that remains to do is, write down the Doppelkonditional formal:

[(AX ∨ Y) ∧ F → B] ∧ [B → (AX ∨ Y) ∧ F]

This squeezes out of nothing more than that A is causally relevant for B . Or, if A is the celibate life, and B of sexual abuse, we now have the formal record of Cardinal Schönborn's premise "If celibacy would blame ...".

Now we must still make the conclusion. "There is no abuse in the Family" is now nothing more than

¬ [¬ (AX ∧ F) ∧ B]

is the entire logical conclusion of the winner so

{[(AX ∨ Y) ∧ F → B] ∧ [B → (AX ∨ Y) ∧ F]} → {¬ [¬ (AX ∧ F) ∧ B]}

Now we form using the relationship (Q → P) ≡ ¬ (Q ∧ ¬ P) nor the conclusion at:

{[(AX ∨ Y) ∧ F → B] ∧ [B → (AX ∨ Y) ∧ F] → {B} → (AX ∧ F)}

And only now revealed the full depth, the whole vision of the laureates! The "classic" "∨ Y" is eliminated! We are facing a conclusion in which she could discover only a special genius. And while the science is faced with a challenge. The performance of the cardinal, it is also at the same time calling and task. Do we really need the whole premise for this conclusion? Can we simplify even directly from an X → (Y ∨ Z) → X to Y? For a long time after us, the greatest minds of future generations look into this matter be. And long after our people will wrestle with the intellectual challenges of a distinguished Catholics like Cardinal Schönborn. But we ourselves are forced to content ourselves today with a quick glance at this broad field. But we must be grateful. Thankful that it was permitted us to be there, as this wide field of an outstanding intellectual figure as Cardinal Schönborn was opened for mankind. And with this final thought, it's up to me to open the buffet. Of course, this also alcoholic beverages are served. For alcohol, which is now exactly what it asked for the simple mind now. Thank you. (This fact then joined another 17 min 23 sec continuous applause.)

80009 Headset Problem

Fortunately, there's the subjunctive

wrote What the Taz this week yet?

And time already knew for some time, things like

Unmatched is still Heiner Geissler!

Ok - understood principle! Now I try it yourself:

- Plato would Today, as migrants in Germany ( "Land of Ideas" !).

- Balzac would now be Prime Minister of Italy ( "splendor and misery of the courtesans' !).

- Determines Sartre would now FDP Chairman ( "Being and Nothingness" , "Nausea" !).

And all because I'm sure, would now read The truth about the truth !

Corn Starch Where To Buy Uk

The threshold between day and night. I wonder collection

Time and again we cross the threshold of consciousness between day and night again - in the morning and evening, sometimes later, sometimes earlier. On the day we are awake and - more or less - consciously, we choose this and that and are constantly in action and current activities, internally and externally. Our consciousness is active and alert. On the night when we sleep, our daily consciousness is off, it sleeps. In the night they are aware moods, sounds, pictures and dream events, of which we are surrounded, and which we sometimes take up to the day. There are two different languages spoken in that day and the night with us.

When I wake up in the morning, the day is still not come before me. He opens his room - sometimes with a sunrise - but shows little of his own Projects, quietly, he offered himself. The threshold between waking and sleeping can happen quickly or slowly, if I always take a look inside the back. I have to reflect on the day to go to him to be really awake, and make me realize what the day might demand of me and what I want to do with him. The day offers itself, 365 times a year, without warranty promise - I'm the one who can make something of it.

There will be requirements to which I have the latest. Times that are "busy" from the outset. But there will also be open moments. Moments that are out of himself, from me and the social structure in which I stand straight, result. Perhaps these moments happen sleepwalking, perhaps aware of. One thing is certain, the seconds, minutes and hours pass without mercy. Time passes - no matter what I do with it.

still lying in bed, or perhaps standing in the shower, I sense a mood in me, which is not necessarily to put into words. She comes out of the night that lies behind me. Even if I do not recall "specifically" at night dream events, internal meetings or spiritual encounters, leaving the night but a sound inside of me. Sometimes I am sad and dark, sometimes bright and full of energy, there are days in which more than outweighs a confidence, but sometimes the concerns about what is coming. There are nights that leave me with a word, a thought, a poem or a sentence. But sometimes I also feel that the night keeps me trapped in a black box.

In the night we handle what we did on the previous day, thought and felt before and prepare internally for what lies ahead. If we can not sleep the night, then there is something that is not yet free of the day. Who does not know that we want to sleep on a particular subject only once - nights's sleep can mysteriously give a certainty that produce no conscious thought can. They say that we meet at night in our sleeping angels and the earthly and heavenly realities are linked. Gives us the idea of night waking in the morning - if we pay attention.

By Tagesrückblick in the evening and a foresight on the day we give the night a chance to make yourself understood at the two thresholds. And during the day when we once again pause and listen into us, then we may hear the quiet voice within us that speaks from the soft gold of the night to us. can be

• Preparatory questions from the day the night

What have I thought, felt and done? What was
the most important thing today?
Which was a special moment?
What question remained unanswered?
What answer, which set I've heard is, for me?
Is there something I am ashamed of what I did wrong?
Was there a moment that has such an inner dark abyss open before me?
there been word-gifts, the sense I have not understood?
Is there something I want to sleep first? What I am
the day into the night?

Direct questions to the night are personal, concrete and not to generalize. They result from the day's events, internal company requirements and needs, the issues with which one is employed. Are you an offer to the night. Principle can, however, say that up is possible on any curious questions about the future. If we deeply open and not "results-oriented," the night to ask for something to offer us her in relation to this or that question, then they will respond - in one way or another. Maybe not with a specific sentence, but certainly with a mood, a sound, a picture or a note. Maybe this happens not directly in the first seconds of the day, but during the morning.

• mood from the night of the day:

What dreams I have brought? How
is my mood?
Is there a sound, word, a picture?
What is my first thought?
How do I feel?
Am I rested, alert and full of energy?
Or I feel sadness, lethargy or heaviness?
I get a direct answer to my question?
Or did I forget my question?
To whom or what I think, who comes to my mind?

is possible to formulate a set of the evening - on the day when I asked about my condition. And in the morning, also for a set a record of what has brought the night where I ended up in the morning and from where I walk back into a new day as it comes. Perhaps like the one or the other of them in the comments tell us something - I would appreciate it.

How To Dry Out Gloves

The world and me. If questions about the intersection

When I look at the world, then I see a lot of things that could be done so that should be done or even should. The earth cries out to be treated well and better, extinct plants and animals threaten and do survive, and at the level of the people, there is a whole universe of things that could be further developed and made to take, or should.

The above verbs lead to a seemingly arbitrary list of dance. Each time they have interchanged and there is no clear evidence as to which word where is. That depends on the perspective and skills from which someone what someone can or should be - quite apart from what someone wants, which is included individual and situational reasons. Let's look at the tension between the individual and the world in terms of the above words and listen to the world and in ourselves into it. What is there to understand at this level?

When I look at me, then I see things I can, I shall for any reason, must or I will. The level of skills and abilities of the things that I can take it a special role. There are things that I know I can - that are somehow on the Hand that I just do. Both the world and I know myself and accept that I can some things, like cook dinner or write a blog text - which is not at the level of ability in question.

There is also a hidden skill. Something that lies in me, but has not yet come to light. A lying in my ability so that also for me and himself, as was not born for the world outside and wait for specific moments or situations. This is a mysterious ability to recall, those are skills and abilities - the show is not always and not to deliberately control, but can emerge suddenly.

Another type of ability is for myself hidden, but visible to the world. I will have expected something, something in wearing something passed - as I do not recognize me until now had not considered capable. The world sees something in me that I do not own or which I know nothing - what I can. Depending on the ratio in which I stand, "the world" to my fellow human beings and the living things around me, these options are visible, they can be taken consciously or just neglected.

be seen from this example how closely the individual and World are connected with each other, the possibilities and responsibilities encounters between "the world" and I thinly. But what is really "the world"? Apart from many others, my fellow human beings in every case to - they are outside of me (and simultaneously a part of me). As an essential network are all the human connections, possibilities and impossibilities of the Earth, are part of the world - and me.

over the words "should" and "must", could write a long philosophical treatises. It depends on the angle from the perspective attitude to life, the human image and more off. "Should" and "must" are individually despite globalized world and justify by their respective needs and circumstances in a particular context. So there are different worlds in one world.

or specifically, what remains is me, my will. My will. Will impulses are not controlled by the world, but be embedded in my by my destiny, past, present and future by myself. And even this level has a mystery in itself. Because, I know what I want? I really know in depth what I want? I steer my feet deliberately on certain routes? Intuitions about there. Feelings. And on the surface also a strong exhortations. But it remains a mystery - we do not know all the moments where we realize that we have done something and later realize that it was just what we wanted in the depths of our being, what belongs to our destination - we did not? Or vice versa, that we do things for which we are ashamed afterwards - which we did not want?

The questions I posed in the Christmas season have triggered something in me. They have come from the inside out - I have made the world. And many comments, questions, answers and comments are then on the outside of me, came to me. And from this movement results in a fabric, a network - a breath between me and the world. " "The World" - my readers! - Have asked me or asked to provide further questions. I wonder if I can, I do not know. Whether I should or must be fully open. What I do know that I want it - so I'll do it. Just because I do not need - but only because I want it! (This is why I "must" it.)

individual and the world are two inseparable things, they go forth apart. Signs are the words may, should, must - must - And want. Only the will to my own will, which decides whether I go out on a Can, Should or Must if I want the things is, and must actually do. But how will I wake my sleeping on soft?

How To Navagate In Fsx

Hegel Prize for contempt of logic 2010 - The Final Days!

The vote on the first carrier of the Hegel Prize for ending the disregard of logic in a few days, and the preparations for the ceremony are in full swing! The Subcommittee on the award certificate creation is working hard to fiddle with only OpenOffice a professional looking document together. The Subcommittee on Festlichkeitsausgestaltung has been concerned in Craft Supplies golden wire to weave a victory wreath. The champagne is already made cold, and the Award Committee is already thought about the remaining 11 days are warm with beer. And if it still manages to win the woman of the prize committee president, then there are the awards ceremony even sandwiches! Finally, full 104 votes cast in just 24 days, the passionate interest of world public document at this price, which in its political sensitivity is possibly surpassed by the Nobel Peace Prize (voices from the international publicity "Furthermore, does the nomination of A [Cardinal Schönborn] pretty ridiculous," "So, candidate C [Niebel] must but either way get a prize." ). High time, all accumulated in one or other way to answer questions about the price even faster!

Is not it unfair to make statements such heavyweights as the Cardinals on a par with the testimony of "little lights" such as sewage treatment plant operators?

No. Anyone who incurred by in full possession of his faculties Statements in the media, be it the "new" or the "old", excelled, has the same chance to get on a price. It lies only with the voters, where appropriate weights for the meaning of the author make.

Is not it pointless to nominate representatives of the Catholic Church? After all the deals with nothing but the contempt of logic.

No. The nomination of the winners does not distinguish between professional disregard of logic, and the approach of ambitious amateurs. Again, it is alone with the voters to make weights for the professionalism of the author.

And also those prices would make without the representatives of the clergy even half as much fun.

Is not it pointless to nominate a representative to the FDP? After all, his party is already on the ground anyway.

No. Apart from the fact that in the case of the FDP Nachtreten justified morally prostrate on the ground: as long as the FDP receives more votes than the party drivers, it is still not where it really belongs.

also report illustrates a political nomination to the intellectual standards of this blog, as an equal medium alongside such quality publications such as the Cicero, the Focus will and perceived Niederlausitzer newspaper to.

Why is the price actually named after Hegel?

Here, one could do a far gehene analysis: The critique of German idealism, combined with the criticism of the reasoning of the Prize candidate, increased to defamation of both sides! Once the contempt for Hegel Argumentionsweise by more people coming out of analytic philosophy is (formulated impressive elected by Bertrand Russell in the History of Western Philosophy Leitzitat and as this blog) underlined by the identification with the reasoning of the candidate. Moreover, the contempt for the reasoning of the candidates being considered by the philosophy of Hegel is given expression. And - worse The logic, the more interesting conclusions - that fits so as to Hegel on the Prize candidate!

The real reason for the Namesgebung the price is different. The reference to the weighty name of a poorly understood philosopher report illustrates the intellectual standards of this blog, as an equal medium alongside such quality publications such as the Cicero, the Focus and Niederlausitzer Newspapers to be perceived.

So where is all clear now, even faster the last few days and vote for your favorite!

Brown And Yellow Cervical Mucus

The great cycles of the sky

In our popular little series "The Wheel of History" land [ Part 1, Part 2 ] we today in astrology. Only the image announced on 15 January, the "Astro- shock", then jumps today also the Süddeutsche on . The astrologers are shocked, the star signs are wrong! The rotation of the Earth's axis, the sun is not even today the constellations with which the chart to a specific date is calculated! Oh dear, young women are not virgins [Symbol photo!] !

Good, the image we want to say nothing further. But even the Süddeutsche know, after a lecture by astronomer Parke Kunkle "was nothing like before! "It really Kunkle has repeatedly only to explain what astronomers for more than a thousand years." And what newspapers are apparently in for decades. For in this case, we can now even dig very deep back into the newspaper archives. Not only that the image 2002 already with the same headline was therefore , no, the phenomenon the shift of the constellations of the zodiac by the rotation of the Earth's axis, we find, for example, already mentioned

- in the mirror 47/1950

- in the mirror 8 / 1978

- in Focus 13/1997

- from the online world 29th August 2008

self in Wikipedia is the effect fully explained, and much more numerous, more or less imaginative opinions of astrologers, why can they not care this effect will be astronomical. Obviously do not just turn on the astrologers of their clients all crap but also the Süddeutsche ...

Women's Jackets With Patches On The Elbows

Red gummi bears make stupid!

first occurs Thilo Sarrazin loose a debate on foreigners, thus rinsing the DVA Publisher million in its coffers. Then comes Sarrazin Ursula, wife of Thilo Sarrazin, also a debate going on formation and rescues the Focus-anniversary edition. And now this blog is ultimately the very great fortune! We present today: a guest post by Joseph Sarrazin (7), the son of Thilo Sarrazin! Again, kindled a debate in Germany, and once again the silent majority has found her voice! Read it now exclusively on this blog:

Of red gummi bears one is stupid!
A guest post by Joseph Sarrazin (7), Berlin

Hello! In the German gummy bears bags more and more red jelly babies in there. I find it stupid. Back when I was 6 years old, there were fewer red jelly babies in the bag. And for more yellow. I asked my dad, and he made me a statistic. In a bag of red gummi bears are 43.1% there. I do not know how much is that, but I think this is too much. Papa says that since the Communists put behind. These are the ones who want that live quite a lot of foreigners in Germany. And all the more be more stupid. And the foreigners who steal to me then the last jelly baby. Those who do not are red. And the food on the then. Or so says Dad. And Mama says that we German children are getting dumber. That must be because the take Aisha and her friends always eat all the yellow and gummy bears. And because we can only eat the red gummy bears from the Communists, so we will be more stupid. Because communists are indeed stupid. And they make the red jelly babies. Papa says it's important that I say this. For this is true that more and more red gummy bears in the bag in there. And what is right, I must say so, says Dad. Bye!

And once again joins Sarrazin a delicate but necessary debate going on in the country! Make red jelly babies really stupid? And really stuck behind the Communists, and not before the multi-cultural eco-green? Join the debate

And soon they read here shocking new truths!
Next week: Declared
Seven Years Sarrazin, Ursula, as they may cancel the key lock on her cell phone again!

Fall On My Elbow Swollen

the beginning was the word - in the end, porn

To hear how devout Pastafari consequently for starting Thank God! in Monster is thanks! modify , then falls again on one, how far wolfed Christianity in the language. And the German is of course not alone. In English, we wish God's blessing a sneeze ( God bless you! ), and who the Bavarian Hello! always found stupid that is with the English ¡Adiós! - a Dios - not a bit happier.
But if you have it makes to avoid the contamination of the Christian language, then one is faced with even greater responsibilities. Only time would probably be abandoned to a long list of common ways of speaking . Learn About wash the hands of ("I wash my hands of it and keep me, Lord, to thine altar," Psalm 26.6, "As Pilate saw that he made nothing, but that rather a tumult was, took water and he washed his hands before the multitude, saying, "I am innocent of the blood of this just see to it yourselves," Mt 27.24), or cast pearls before swine ("You shall not give sanctuary to the dogs! and your pearls before swine cast, that they may not trample them under their feet and turn again and rend you. "Mt 7.6), or his light under a bushel ("One does not light a lamp and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick;. It shines for all who are in the house," Matthew 5.14), and, and, and ...
is really difficult but then it only when it comes to words that are not on the basis of Christianity. Even though there are practical words for such branched affinity chains such as the brother of my spouse ( Schwager ), or the spouse of the brother of my spouse ( brother-), but are for what are potentially much closer relationship with the father / mother of my child, it no special name. The other parent may be declared only as my husband / wife, or little common practice of going through the child. Apparently lacking a word for the other parent of my child, because it was in the Christian West does not give children without marriage.
same Christian sexual morality has distorted other words completely. A good example is the BH . In the bra behind this abbreviation we may well understand the holder yet. But the fact that the bra has just busts? In other languages Christian sees it as not much better. The English bra is also a short cut, just for a foreign word, brassiere. This French word is by no means in France for a bra, but for a jacket . In French, the bra a is soutien-gorge . And so rather something that supports the neck . Everywhere people seem to shy away from mentioning the tit like the plague. The contrast with the languages of non-Christian or late Christianized peoples is even more glaring. In Chinese, the bra a xiōngyī . And xiong chest and yī the clothing. Quite so clear. Pure in heart, only the speaker of Creole languages such as Tok Pisin from New Guinea. There is the bra a banis bilong susu , Banis the enclosure bilong something like of ("belong"), and susu the breast. And an enclosure for the breasts, the bra is just that, ultimately, yes.
means that there remains too much to do for the language cleaner for Pastafari. Whether one likes it or not, the age-old heritage of Christianity in their languages, even into the depths of the vocabulary, the Europeans would be well after the end of Christianity, not in generations to overcome.

Uhaul That Fits Queen Size

This strange relationship between the know ... and the real story

"I think my problem is this strange relationship between the knowledge, learning, theory and the real story I know very well -. And I think I've known since my childhood - that knowledge has not the power change the world. maybe I am wrong. And I am sure that I got from a theoretical point of injustice, for I know very well that the knowledge has changed the world.

But when I refer to my own experience I have a feeling that the knowledge can do nothing for us, and that political power is capable of destroying us. All knowledge of the world, I prefer not to to. All the things I say, depends not with whom, what I think in theory (I know it is wrong), but with what I deduced from my own experience. I know that knowledge has power to transform us, that truth is not merely a way to decipher the world [...], but I when I tell the truth to be transformed will. And perhaps saved. Or will I die then, but I glabue in any case that it is the same for me, "

[Michel Foucault: Dits et Ecrits IV, p. 654]

Taxi Place Card Holders

be the fourth king. The path of failure

Again and again I have to think of the history of the fourth king. So many years I had only the three kings, Caspar, Melchior and Balthasar known - with their heads raised, their astonishing gifts, incense, myrrh and gold, and their short and successful visit to the newborn child in Bethlehem. The fourth king is Artaban and he embodies the human, earthly journey to Christianity. The path marked by the failure is, and some of us might know.

Artaban is the fourth way from the East, he will follow with the other three the star to Bethlehem to worship the new king. He takes him for a sapphire, with a ruby and a pearl. But he achieved his companions in time because he a patient who was in his way, and helped saved his life. The others are already gone when he arrives at the agreed location. Artaban makes himself alone on the vast and unknown journey, he follows the star imperturbable. For to follow the course of the star, it is said, means to untangle the threads of the mystery of life from beginning to end.

His trip is delayed. He must sell the sapphire in order to procure equipment that enable it to cross the desert alone. It further follows the star, because the stars represent the thoughts of the eternal and thus the new. Artaban remains true to its path and draws inspiration from his faith, his love and hope have to welcome the new king to be allowed even though the time is advanced and the star is already fading. When he finally comes

to Bethlehem, the holy family had fled - his three companions who had preceded him, has already moved on. Exhausted, he finds a refuge with a young woman with a small child, and he may, on the basis of the give-way there his ruby, prevent even the little child in this house the soldiers of Herod falls victim.

Artaban moves on. Weak and tired. He seeks the king does not lose its track, but he is always too late. Years pass. Often he is in despair. After thirty-three years, he is as old and frail man back to Jerusalem to die, but still a seeker after the new king, even though he has almost given up. Only his pearl it has remained as a gift yet. Since it is a troop of soldiers against that drives a young girl before him, to be sold as a slave.

clasped the girl in fear the weak Artaban knees and begs for help. And once again threatens to shatter the soul Artaban in doubt - he should give even the last gift, without having found the king? Artaban gives in and gives it the Pearl of the girl so that she has a ransom. He himself admits that his quest has failed, that it is over and that he would die now, without finding the star.

It lies on the edge of the road and see how crowds move past him to Calvary, to be there when two notorious robbers, and one who is called Jesus of Nazareth to be crucified. Artaban indulges his weakness, and hears a voice, to his Heart speaks. "Verily I say unto you, What you have done the least of my brethren, ye have done it unto me." And so in death he is the new king, he has sought for so long, very close. He finds him.
This story touched me very
. What I have not once asked for anything, and I made myself a little determination. Desire, intention, determination - such simple words. Yes, some things have already been around when I look back, - but much, much, not - not at all! And sometimes I doubt whether I am on the right path, if my star is still lit, and if I know my fellow travelers.

The story of Artaban gives me comfort. It shows how so many different story, say as "Lord of the Rings" or "Parsifal", how right you are doing it to stay with his wishes, plans and decisions loyal, even if it still seems so hopeless, because we rarely know where in the great journey we find ourselves.

failure, or rather alleged failure hurts. And success (perceived success?), We have grown up like us. But if I read all the wonderful comments that have arrived so quietly and softly and incessantly on my Christmas questions, then I see how much pain, uncertainty and tedious way we all tread to the stars to follow to carry the faith to live the love and not give up our hopes.

I thank you very much for every single comment, because each fragment is a piece of every star in the evening sky, where each of us follows that each of us is. Henry van Dyke

: The fourth way. Published at the Goetheanum, Dornach (CH).

Kobe 81 Point Game Watch Online

Christmas Question Question XII XIII

What has the opening to the spiritual world showed you, given you what you offer the world in the new year?

1949 Willys Jeepster Vin Loacation

Christmas Christmas

What did you dream what you dream - and what follows from your dream consciousness?