The vote on the first carrier of the Hegel Prize for ending the disregard of logic in a few days, and the preparations for the ceremony are in full swing! The Subcommittee on the award certificate creation is working hard to fiddle with only OpenOffice a professional looking document together. The Subcommittee on Festlichkeitsausgestaltung has been concerned in Craft Supplies golden wire to weave a victory wreath. The champagne is already made cold, and the Award Committee is already thought about the remaining 11 days are warm with beer. And if it still manages to win the woman of the prize committee president, then there are the awards ceremony even sandwiches! Finally, full 104 votes cast in just 24 days, the passionate interest of world public document at this price, which in its political sensitivity is possibly surpassed by the Nobel Peace Prize (voices from the international publicity "Furthermore, does the nomination of A [Cardinal Schönborn] pretty ridiculous," "So, candidate C [Niebel] must but either way get a prize." ). High time, all accumulated in one or other way to answer questions about the price even faster! Is not it unfair to make statements such heavyweights as the Cardinals on a par with the testimony of "little lights" such as sewage treatment plant operators?
No. Anyone who incurred by in full possession of his faculties Statements in the media, be it the "new" or the "old", excelled, has the same chance to get on a price. It lies only with the voters, where appropriate weights for the meaning of the author make.
Is not it pointless to nominate representatives of the Catholic Church? After all the deals with nothing but the contempt of logic.
No. The nomination of the winners does not distinguish between professional disregard of logic, and the approach of ambitious amateurs. Again, it is alone with the voters to make weights for the professionalism of the author.
And also those prices would make without the representatives of the clergy even half as much fun.
Is not it pointless to nominate a representative to the FDP? After all, his party is already on the ground anyway.
No. Apart from the fact that in the case of the FDP Nachtreten justified morally prostrate on the ground: as long as the FDP receives more votes than the party drivers, it is still not where it really belongs.
also report illustrates a political nomination to the intellectual standards of this blog, as an equal medium alongside such quality publications such as the Cicero, the Focus will and perceived Niederlausitzer newspaper to.
Why is the price actually named after Hegel?
Here, one could do a far gehene analysis: The critique of German idealism, combined with the criticism of the reasoning of the Prize candidate, increased to defamation of both sides! Once the contempt for Hegel Argumentionsweise by more people coming out of analytic philosophy is (formulated impressive elected by Bertrand Russell in the History of Western Philosophy Leitzitat and as this blog) underlined by the identification with the reasoning of the candidate. Moreover, the contempt for the reasoning of the candidates being considered by the philosophy of Hegel is given expression. And - worse The logic, the more interesting conclusions - that fits so as to Hegel on the Prize candidate!
The real reason for the Namesgebung the price is different. The reference to the weighty name of a poorly understood philosopher report illustrates the intellectual standards of this blog, as an equal medium alongside such quality publications such as the Cicero, the Focus and Niederlausitzer Newspapers to be perceived.
So where is all clear now, even faster the last few days and vote for your favorite!
0 comments:
Post a Comment